![]()
Summary
This paper is intended to compare the results obtained with use of different geophysical methods (geomagnetics, electrical resistivity tomography, ground-penetrating radar and seismics) on a archaeological site and discuss the prospects of such an integration between geophysics and archaeology. The relevant experience thus obtained should help to locate more efficiently the buried structures (graves) in the subsurface. This research was carried out within the framework of the Field Camp 2014 devoted to exploration of the 4th to 7th century burial site near Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
Introduction
The objective of the field camp was the Podvyaze burial site close to Nizhny Novgorod, Russia. It is a monument of the 4th to 7th century, which was discovered in 1959. The first grave of the complex was found and studied in 2010. Two years later, the first research excavation was carried out by local archaeologists. Nowadays, Podvyaze is listed in the state register of cultural heritage of the Russian Federation and is recognized as a monument of federal importance.
Currently, the excavated area of the monument has a size of about 120 square meters. In addition to 28 discovered graves with humans and animals, archaeologists have found 584 objects. Amongst others, these are costume parts, belts, adornments of shoes, bracelets, rings, coins, and elements of weapons like arrow- and spearheads, axes, items of horse gear, glass beads, and antique pottery. The most valuable artifact found so far is a short single-blazed sword, which usually appeared in Roman provinces in the Danube river region.
The aim of our Field Camp was to reveal buried structures and to support archeological work in the sense of pinpointing proper excavation sites. Knowing where to search for subsurface artifacts does not only help archeologists save time, but more importantly also helps them to prevent object damages during future excavations. We decided to reach this goal by the application of different geophysical methods, which are geomagnetics, geoelectrics (ERT), ground-penetrating radar (GPR), and modification of Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW). Moreover, it was very interesting and extremely important for us to answer the question which method works the best when applied on such a site.