The artificial lift system (AL) is the most efficient production technique in optimizing production from unconventional horizontal oil and gas wells. Nonetheless, due to declining reservoir pressure during the production life of a well, artificial lifting of oil and gas remains a critical issue. Notwithstanding the attempt by several studies in the past few decades to understand and develop cutting-edge technologies to optimize the application of artificial lift in tight formations, there remains differing assessments of the best approach, AL type, optimum time and conditions to install artificial lift during the life of a well. This report presents a comprehensive review of artificial lift systems application with specific focus on tight oil and gas formations across the world. The review focuses on thirty-three (33) successful and unsuccessful fieldtests in unconventional horizontal wells over the past few decades. The purpose is to apprise the industry and academic researchers on the various AL optimization approaches that have been used and suggest AL optimization areas where new technologies can be developed.
This course discusses the fundamental sand control considerations involved in completing a well and introduces the various sand control techniques commonly used across the industry, including standalone screens, gravel packs, high rate water packs and frac-packs. It requires only a basic understanding of oilfield operations and is intended for drilling, completion and production personnel with some sand control experience who are looking to gain a better understanding of each technique’s advantages, limitations and application window for use in their upcoming completions.
PETRONAS FLNG SATU (PFLNG1) is a floating liquefied natural gas facility producing 1.2 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of LNG, on a facility that is 365m long, and 60m wide, making it among the largest offshore facility ever built. The PFLNG1 project is the first of its kind in the world and is the first deployment of PETRONASâ€™ Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) technology, consolidating the traditional offshore to onshore LNG infrastructure into a single facility. This will see a giant floating facility capable of extracting, liquefying and storing LNG at sea, before it is exported to customers around the globe. The FLNG journey has come a long way since 2006, with many technological options explored to monetise and unlock the potential of small and stranded gas fields. Moving an LNG production to an offshore setting poses a demanding set of challenges â€“ as every element of a conventional LNG facility needs to fit into an area roughly one quarter the size in the open seas whilst maintaining safety and increased flexibility to LNG production and delivery. The keynote address describes the breakthrough features of PFLNG1 â€“ the worldâ€™s first floating LNG facility; and the pioneering innovation that it brings to the LNG industry.
A hydrocarbon find has always been an exploration geologist’s adventure and has remained at the forefront of the E&P cycle for the survival of the oil and gas industry. Big and easy finds are a distant past; therefore, the quest has shifted to go beyond conventional sandstones and carbonates to more complex areas of unconventionals: low porosity, low permeability, low resistivity, tight and ultra-tight, HPHT, shale, CBM, gas hydrates, and any other possible regime including deeper, geologically complex, and seismically opaque features such as salt, basalt, sub-basalt, even basement.
Africa (Sub-Sahara) Eni started production from the Nené Marine field, which sits in the Marine XII block in 28 m of water, 17 km offshore the Republic of the Congo. The first phase of the field produces from the Djeno pre-salt formation, 2.5 km below the ocean floor at a rate of 7,500 BOEPD. Future development will take place in several stages and will involve the installation of more production platforms and the drilling of at least 30 wells. Eni (65%) is the operator with partners New Age (25%), and Société Nationale des Pétroles du Congo (10%). The well's primary target is the Bunian structure: a four-way, fault-bounded anticline, which was defined by a 3D seismic survey. It will be drilled to a total depth of 1682 m.
Africa (Sub-Sahara) Bowleven's Moambe exploration well on the Bomono Permit onshore Cameroon has encountered hydrocarbons. The well was drilled to a planned total depth of 5,803 ft and made its discovery in Paleocene-aged (Tertiary) target reservoir intervals. Moambe is the second in a two-well exploration program on the permit. The first well, Zingana, also discovered hydrocarbons. The Moambe well will be tested before further testing takes place at Zingana. Bowleven holds 100% interest in the permit. Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production has begun production at the Bonga Phase 3 project, an expansion of the deepwater Bonga project in Nigeria. Peak production from the expansion is expected to be 50,000 BOEPD, which will be shipped by pipelines to the Bonga floating production, storage, and offloading facility.
Cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) involves the deliberate initiation of sand influx during the completion procedure, maintenance of sand influx during the productive life of the well, and implementation of methods to separate the sand from the oil for disposal. No sand exclusion devices (screens, liners, gravel packs, etc.) are used. The sand is produced along with oil, water, and gas and separated from the oil before upgrading to a synthetic crude. To date, deliberate massive sand influx has been used only in unconsolidated sandstone (UCSS) reservoirs (φ 30%) containing viscous oil (μ 500 cp). It has been used almost exclusively in the Canadian heavy-oil belt and in shallow ( 800 m), low-production-rate wells (up to 100 to 125 m3/d).
Horizontal wells are being employed in innovative ways in steam injection operations to permit commercial exploitation of reservoirs that are considered unfavorable for steam, such as very viscous oils and bitumen and heavy oil formations with bottomwater. This page discusses some of the ways in which horizontal wells have been used to enhance steamflooding. Numerous papers have explored steam injection using horizontal- vertical-well combinations by use of scaled physical models or numerical simulators. For example, Chang, Farouq Ali, and George used scaled models to study five-spot steamfloods, finding that for their experimental conditions, a horizontal steam injector and a horizontal producer yielded the highest recovery. Figure 1 shows a comparison of oil recoveries for various combinations of horizontal and vertical wells and for four different cases: homogeneous formation, 10% bottomwater (% of oil zone thickness), 50% bottomwater, and homogeneous formation with 10% pore volume solvent injection before steam.
The claim that the world is irresponsible in rapidly consuming irreplaceable resources ignores technical progress, market pressures, and the historical record. For example, the "Club of Rome," with the use of exponential growth assumptions and extrapolations under static technology, predicted serious commodity shortages before 2000, including massive oil shortages and famine. First, the new production technologies are proof that science and knowledge continue to advance and that further advances are anticipated. Second, oil prices will not skyrocket because technologies such as manufacturing synthetic oil from coal are waiting in the wings. Third, the new technologies have been forced to become efficient and profitable, even with unfavorable refining penalties. Fourth, exploration costs for new conventional oil production capacity will continue to rise in all mature basins, whereas technologies such as CHOPS can lower production costs in such basins. Fifth, technological feedback from heavy-oil production is improving conventional oil recovery. Finally, the heavy-oil resource in UCSS is vast. Although it is obvious that the amount of conventional (light) oil is limited, the impact of this limitation, while relevant in the short term (2000 to 2030), is likely to be inconsequential to the energy industry in the long term (50 to 200 years). The first discoveries in the Canadian heavy-oil belt were made in the Lloydminster area in the late 1920s. Typically, 10- to 12-mm diameter perforations were used, and pump jacks were limited by slow rod-fall velocity in the viscous oil to a maximum of 8 to 10 m3/d of production, usually less. Operators had to cope with small amounts of sand, approximately 1% in more viscous oils. Small local operators learned empirically that wells that continued to produce sand tended to be better producers, and efforts to exclude sand with screens usually led to total loss of production. Operators spread the waste sand on local gravel roads and, in some areas, the roadbeds are now up to 1.5 m higher because of repeated sand spreading. The sharp oil price increases in the 1970s and 1980s led to great interest in heavy-oil-belt resources (approximately 10 109m3). Many international companies arrived and introduced the latest screen and gravel-pack technology but, in all cases, greatly impaired productivity or total failure to bring the well on production was the result. To this day, there are hundreds of inactive wells with expensive screens and gravel packs. The advent of progressing cavity (PC) pumps in the 1980s changed the nonthermal heavy-oil industry in Canada. The first PC pumps had low lifespans and were not particularly cost-effective, but better quality control and continued advances led to longer life and fewer problems. The rate limits of beam pumps were no longer a barrier and, between 1990 and 1995, operators changed their view of well management.
This paper attempts to use analogs of coals and Coal bed Methane (CBM) properties in Sedimentary basins to mutual advantage from the knowledge of each other.
An attempt has been made here to showcase as to why two Coal bearing formations, Lower Eocene, Cambay in India and Miocene, South Sumatra, Indonesia can be compared with each other in terms of coal quality and CBM characteristics.
Cambay basin, with an area of 56,000 sq kms is an elongated NNW-SSE rift basin in the western part of India. The basin fill comprises Mesozoic(?) sediments capped by Late Cretaceous Deccan volcanics and a thick tertiary pile of fluvio deltaics. Thick Lignite to sub bituminous coal is found in Middle (two thick seams) and Lower Eocene section (three thick seams of 20-35 m range and one thin seam of 1-10m). Chemically, the Middle Eocene lignite-sub bituminous coal is characteristically low in moisture (4-5%), quite low in ash (1-11%) and high in volatiles (43-55%). The Lower Eocene coals are sub bituminous with 10-20% moisture, low ash(5-10%), low Sulphur(<1%) content. The gas content of the Lower Eocene coals are 6 cubic metre / tonnne, with permeability 1-3 Md with seams slightly over pressured. Depth ranges of both these coal horizons are between1000-1800m approximately.
South Sumatra basin, double in size wrt Cambay basin with an area of 100,000 sq kms, is a NE-SW trending, backarc basin. Series of half grabens punctuated with basement highs, holds Miocene and Eocene Coals in the grabens of a mostly Tertiary sedimentary pile. The Miocene coals (formed in tide dominated coastal plain) are sub bituminous, with VRo 0.4-0.5, low ash(<10%), Moisture(10-18%), high volatile matter of around 40% at depths 300-1000m, with 20-30 seams with gas content of 7 cubic metre / tonne. The Older Eocene Coals are1-10 m thick at depths 1000-2000m formed in peat bogs in fluvial settings.
The Indonesian Coals of Miocene age are very comparable in coal properties and gas content to the Middle and Lower Eocene Coals of Cambay basin and can supplement each other in studies for CBM exploration and exploitation. Of great similarity are the coal quality, ash% and gas content. To take the comparisons further ahead, detailing of thickness, extent, geometry and depositional environments of each of these basins would be advantageous.