Reservoirs consisting of heterogeneous carbonates and shaly sands pose formation evaluation challenges for conventional logging-while-drilling (LWD) measurements. Magnetic resonance techniques hold promise for improving understanding of these reservoirs. Core-flow tests are usually conducted to test and model stimulation treatments at laboratory scale, to predict the performance of such treatments in carbonate reservoirs.
A new multilayer boundary‑detection service has been introduced to resolve the geological uncertainty associated with horizontal wells in Bohai Bay. Geosteering and real time reservoir characterization were used to reduce the uncertainty. Reservoirs consisting of heterogeneous carbonates and shaly sands pose formation evaluation challenges for conventional logging-while-drilling (LWD) measurements. Magnetic resonance techniques hold promise for improving understanding of these reservoirs.
Results to date are compared with previous performance in the Gulf of Thailand (GoT). The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how inaccuracy in standard directional-surveying methods affects wellbore position and to recommend practices to improve surveying accuracy for greater confidence in lateral spacing. Wellbore position is computed from survey measurements taken by a measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tool in the bottomhole assembly (BHA).
Results to date are compared with previous performance in the Gulf of Thailand (GoT). Reservoirs consisting of heterogeneous carbonates and shaly sands pose formation evaluation challenges for conventional logging-while-drilling (LWD) measurements. Magnetic resonance techniques hold promise for improving understanding of these reservoirs. This paper discusses ultradeep directional-resistivity (DDR) logging-while-drilling (LWD) measurements for high-angle and horizontal wells that have been applied recently with success on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS).
Baker Hughes drilled one horizontal well for major Indian operating company in a, low resistivity contrast field, onshore India. The candidate field / basin is a proved petroliferous basin, located in the northeastern corner of India.
The scope of work for this project involved integrating geological and open hole offset parameters to build a Geosteering model. Integrated data included a study of offset well data from the field, regional and local dip analysis from wellbore images, and a review of structural maps. Successful integration of these data helped to steer the well in the desired zone as per plan and make the best use of the data and to reduce uncertainties in Geosteering, drilling. Although high-quality 16-sector images commonly yield bedding dip, fracture and other geological information, this paper emphasizes how real-time reservoir navigation decisions was made using Geosteering modelling, real-time image processing, dip picking study etc.
Kisku, Sayanima (Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.) | Santhosh Kumar, R. (Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.) | Dayal, Har sharad (Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.) | Chadha, Harish Kumar (Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.) | Srivastava, Anil (Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.)
Infill drilling is an integral part of brown field management for exploiting un-drained areas with good oil saturation. In a matured field on water-flood, the primary objective is optimized wellbore placement of infill wells in areas with better petro-physical characteristics, bypassing flooded region. It is also important to design a robust completion strategy to safeguard the longevity of these wells by curtailing produced water. This approach assists in dramatic increase in production by isolating water charged sections and thereby restricting rise in water production.
The use of advanced Logging-While-Drilling techniques during horizontal drilling provides an opportunity for effective well planning. Real-time Logging-While-Drilling instruments during directional drilling gives us the opportunity to acquire information pertaining to the reservoir in a single run. Interpretation from the real-time data acquisition boosts the planning during wellbore drilling.
This paper discusses a case study of a field in western offshore, India, which focuses on the applications of geosteering and the use of swell packers for zonal isolation to augment oil production. In this study, two wells have been deliberated where the real-time information has been extracted and included in the decision making process. The bottom-hole assembly used in this case, comprised standard Logging-While-Drilling services such as gamma ray, resistivity, neutron porosity, density and density imaging services and also formation pressure testing.
Since the field under study is a carbonate reservoir that has been on waterflood for the last twenty eight years, chances of early breakthrough of water in the infill wells has posed a high risk in spite of the presence of good bypassed oil saturation. Geosteering has enabled to restrict the horizontal section safely within the desired zone of better oil saturation and geological features, as interpreted from the Logging-While-Drilling data. Further isolation of suspected water bearing zones with swell packers have assisted in healthy well completion by diminishing chances of sharp rise in water cut in the infill wells.
This paper presents a novel methodology to successfully maximize sampling and scanning of formation fluids using formation mapping-while-drilling (FMWD) technology in real time when drilling poorly consolidated formations. The methodology, based on a solid workflow built on experience garnered and captured in various operations and geomechanical studies performed around the world, can be applied in a wide range of wellbore geometries and formation types.
The methodology is based on four processes: 1. Predict, assess, and confirm potential fines migration and formation collapse during FMWD operations. The analysis is based on processing and interpreting existing geomechanical properties from offset wells and real-time newly acquired sonic and/or density data. 2. Design FMWD operations such that formation sanding is prevented, and formation integrity is maintained. 3. Prevent mobilized fines from entering the FMWD tool if partial formation collapsing occurs. 4. Focus the workflow on reducing the negative impact solids will have on the flowline, pump out, and optical analyzers if fines enter the tool.
The paper contains two case studies in which the methodology workflow resulted in successful sampling and real-time downhole fluid analysis of formations with very limited diagenesis and a history of sanding and collapsing during formation testing-while-drilling operations. These two case studies show how assessing offset wells during the planning phase and applying this workflow while evaluating logging while drilling (LWD) petrophysical data in real-time provide a quick insight into how a formation will respond during pump out. The results define station depth selection, timing of the operation with respect to wellbore exposure time, and pump out rate strategy. The application of fixed-rate pump out or intelligent pump out with a fixed differential can then be applied based on the real-time indicators. Specific screen sizes are selected in advance, which limit ingress of fines into the sampling tool. In both case studies, the operating company's objectives were met. An additional case study is presented in which the risk of sanding was not perceived, and no qualification of un-consolidation had taken place, ultimately resulting in formation breakdown in the sampling phase, mobilization of fines, and plugging of the tool; thus, highlighting the value of the novel methodology.
The innovation of this workflow is its holistic approach to sampling while drilling in unconsolidated formations, extensively covering both job planning and execution phases. Additionally, the workflow allows for optimizing tool configuration, and by risk identification, suggests a variety of measures to eliminate or mitigate the impact of partial formation collapse. This workflow extends the application of fluid mapping and sampling while drilling into operational environments, which were previously considered highly unsuitable for this technology.
Cementing forms an essential part of well construction as it supports the casing and provides hydraulic sealing. Wireline (WL) sonic tools have been providing the cement evaluation (CBL/VDL) for more than 50 years. Quantitative cement evaluation is becoming increasingly important in the industry to verify well integrity and zonal isolation. There has been a growing interest in providing cement bond quality quantitatively with LWD sonic tools owing to its plethora of benefits over wireline logging, such as rig time saving, tool conveyance, less tool eccentering effect and timelapse evaluation. However, there is also an LWD specific challenge that has for long hindered the ability to measure quantitative bond index i.e. drill collar contamination which limits the range of cement bond evaluation with the conventional amplitude-based approach. Deriving a characteristic correlation of attenuation measurement against the bond index was one of the key components to overcoming the limitation of amplitude-based. A new hybrid processing approach combining amplitude and attenuation was established for full-range cement bond evaluation. Schlumberger's LWD multipole sonic Cement Evaluation Service delivers the industry's first quantitative bond index answer product on LWD platform. The quantitative bond index becomes even more critical in offshore and deepwater markets.
This paper discusses, in brief, the technology and associated challenges in delivering industry's first quantitative bond index and showcases the result for one of the deepwater well. A subsequent comparison of LWD multipole sonic cement evaluation results with conventional WL CBL-VDL further corroborates the reliability of the result. The performance of the industry's first LWD bond index derived using LWD multipole sonic from around the globe has demonstrated that it can be expected to show abundant success in expanding the LWD utilization globally
A new LWD ultrasonic imager for use in both water- and oil-based muds uses acoustic impedance contrast and ultrasonic amplitude measurements to obtain high-resolution structural, stratigraphic and borehole geometry information. Following extensive testing in the Middle East and the US, this paper presents results from the first European deployment of the new 4.75-in. high-resolution ultrasonic imaging tool.
An ultrasonic transducer, which operates at high frequency, scans the borehole at a high sampling rate to provide detailed measurements of amplitude and traveltime. A borehole caliper measurement is made, based on the time of arrival of the first reflection from the borehole wall. A second measurement detects formation features and tectonic stress indicators from the change in signal amplitude. The amplitude of the reflected wave is a function of the acoustic impedance of the medium. Resulting impedance maps have sufficient resolution to detect sinusoidal, non-sinusoidal and discontinuous features on the borehole wall.
Breakouts, drilling-induced fractures, and tensile zones were used for stress direction determination. Breakout identification was obtained both from amplitude images and oriented potato plot cross sections derived from traveltime measurements.
The orientation of natural fractures is parallel at the maximum stress direction, indicated by drilling-induced fractures and tensile zones. The World Stress Map confirms the maximum stress direction determination.
It was also possible to detect certain key-seat zones and investigate borehole conditions to prevent issues during the subsequent casing job.
The new LWD ultrasonic imaging technique represents an important alternative to density and water-based mud resistivity imaging, which has several limitations. Unlike the resistive imaging LWD tool that is very sensitive to standoff, the higher tolerance of the ultrasonic imaging tool enables the amplitude and traveltime ultrasonic images to contain fewer unwanted artifacts.
During this period, a series of emerging innovations would find commercial success and reshape the upstream industry into the 21st century.Source: SPE. You have access to this full article to experience the outstanding content available to SPE members and JPT subscribers. To ensure continued access to JPT's content, please Sign In, JOIN SPE, or Subscribe to JPT Contrary to popular imagination, which favors John Wayne stereotypes heroically rescuing the oil industry with wrench and hammer, the oilfield is a place of exquisite engineering, the match of anything on Earth, a marvel of innovation at the biggest and smallest scales. The office-block sized blowout preventers on the ocean floor or the minute geopositioning electronics inside a logging while drilling (LWD) tool both are designed to operate perfectly within exacting environmental specifications. Almost every aspect of upstream exploitation is the result of exhaustively leveraging the glorious value chain of math, science, and engineering.