Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage: An Update

Orr, Franklin M. (Stanford University)

OnePetro 

Franklin M. Orr Jr., Stanford University Summary Recent progress in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is reviewed. Considerable experience has now been built up in enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) operations, which have been under way since the 1970s. Storage in deep saline aquifers has also been achieved at scale. Introduction The challenge of making deep reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in this century is a daunting one given the scale of the use of energy by humans and our current dependence on fossil fuels, which provide essential energy services at low cost to modern societies. Meeting the challenge of reducing GHG emissions will require a fully diversified portfolio of approaches, such as much more energy-efficient end-use technologies (e.g., cars, home and business heating and air conditioning, lighting); electrification of energy services coupled with reduced GHG emissions from electric power generation; fuel switching in transportation and electric power generation; deployment of additional renewable power generation; land-use changes toward lower-emission agriculture; emission reductions of short-term forcers such as black carbon, CH Integrated assessments of the various pathways indicate that portfolios that include significant deployment of CCUS have lower estimated costs than those without CCUS (Clarke et al. 2014; Krey et al. 2014). In 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a detailed special report (SRCCS) on many aspects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) (Metz et al. 2005). Wilcox (2012) provided detailed descriptions of specific capture technologies and their energy requirements, as did Boot-Handford et al. (2014), who gave additional commentary on pipeline transportation issues, subsurface storage issues, and a European policy perspective.

  Country: North America > United States (1.00)
  Industry: Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)