Critical Issues in Subsurface Integrity

Schultz, Richard A. (The University of Texas at Austin) | Mutlu, Uno (Rockfield Global Technologies America LLC) | Bere, Adam (Rockfield Global Technologies)



Identifying, risking, and maintaining subsurface integrity is of critical importance to a variety of geologic subsurface operations including geothermal, oil and gas production (conventional, unconventional, fractured crystalline, heavy-oil fields), mining, natural gas storage, and sequestration of CO2 and hazardous waste. Predicting and mitigating out-of-zone fluid migration includes but goes beyond maintaining well integrity: it relies on technical understanding of top and fault seals, reservoir and overburden deformation, production/injection-induced stress changes, reservoir management, completions design and engineering, hydraulic fracturing/height containment, wastewater disposal, induced seismicity/fracture reactivation, and reservoir monitoring (e.g., geodetic and downhole measurement and interpretation). Subsurface integrity excludes surface facilities and spill response but includes regulations regarding subsurface activities.

In this paper we present and synthesize examples of subsurface containment loss from oil and gas fields that are documented in the open literature. We then discuss common risk areas or themes in subsurface containment geomechanics that are important to subsurface integrity and illustrate with some general examples how some of these could be investigated by using geomechanical models.


Containment of produced or injected fluids within their intended wellbores or geologic subsurface zones in oil and gas fields is widely recognized as a critical part of exploration and production (E&P) activities in conventional and unconventional plays and reservoirs. For example, it is a primary objective while drilling exploration, appraisal, development, and production wells. Maintaining the integrity of wellbores and subsurface geologic elements can potentially minimize drilling and operational risk. Effectively managing injection pressures, volumes, and rates of fluids in producing fields depends critically on adequately defining the geomechanical limits set by geologic elements such as overburden, caprock, top seals, faults, and evolving in situ stress states (including reservoir pressures). Characterization of the mechanical integrity of the subsurface relies upon obtaining baseline measurements including lithology, petrophysical and mechanical properties, pore pressure, and stress state that are best obtained during field appraisal and development, before production begins. Because the consequences of subsurface containment loss to an operator or partner can be significant, including both direct and indirect costs (e.g., clean-up cost, loss of production, and damage to reputation), even for small events, containment-related activities have assumed a larger share of enterprise risk as technologically more challenging fields are evaluated and placed into production [1].

  Country: North America > United States (1.00)
  Industry: Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
  Oilfield Places: