Assessment of Creep Potential of Gearle Formation for Griffin Field PP&A Planning

Ozan, C. (BHP) | Araujo, E. (BHP) | Pottle, M. (BHP) | Ondrus, A. (BHP) | Perrett, T. (BHP)

OnePetro 

ABSTRACT: The ability of shale formations to deform and seal the annulus around the casing has been documented in publications and industry presentations. Moreover, development of such natural seals (barriers) in the annulus has been utilized in Permanent plug and abandonment (PP&A) operations as an alternative to conventional PP&A methods and materials. It has been reported that this in fact facilitated the PP&A operations and resulted in considerable cost savings. The objective of this paper is to present the work done to assess the potential of the Gearle formation in the Griffin fields in the southern Carnarvon Basin in Western Australia with respect to its ability to provide a barrier during the PP&A operations. For this purpose, we identify first and second order factors controlling the creep deformation of shales/mudstones. In turn, we compared the material and mechanical properties of Gearle formation with the formations forming seal at NCS and also with other measurements completed on other shales globally. In addition, we have utilized simple numerical creep models to assess the creep potential of Gearle formation to form a barrier around the casing. Later during PP&A operations, we acquired IBC-CBL-VDL logs in the wells and observed evidence of bonding. We, finally, present the cement log bond interpretations in the intervals we observed casing-formation bonding.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Background

Permanent plug and abandonment (PP&A), as common industry practice, is performed by setting a number of cement plugs inside the casing strings. In certain cases, annular seal, traditionally provided by annular cement, may not fulfil the abandonment requirements and rather costly remedial cementing, milling or cut and pull of casing has to be performed in order to complete the PP&A of a well. However, certain rock types, i.e., shale and salt, have the potential to satisfy the requirements for PP&A and can therefore be used as well barrier elements as long as they can be proven to have the required strength and seal around the casing over a sufficient interval. In particular, the ability of shale to deform and seal the annulus around casing to form a barrier has been documented with the experience of operators in the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) in the North Sea -providing ease of operations and cost savings (Carlsen, 2012, Williams et. al, 2009).

  Country: North America > United States (1.00)
  Geologic Time: Phanerozoic > Mesozoic > Cretaceous (1.00)
  Industry: Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
  Oilfield Places: