Effect of Drilling Fluid (Water-Based vs Oil-Based) on Phase Trap Damage in Tight Sand Gas Reservoirs

Tsar, Mitchel (Curtin University) | Bahrami, Hassan (Curtin University) | Rezaee, Reza (Curtin University) | Murickan, Geeno (Curtin University) | Mehmood, Sultan (Curtin University) | Ghasemi, Mohsen (Curtin University) | Ameri, Abolfazl | Mehdizadeh, Mahna

OnePetro 


Tight gas reservoirs are mainly characterized by low matrix permeability and significant damage. During drilling and fracturing of tight formations, wellbore liquid invades into tight formation and increases water saturation around wellbore and eventually reduces permeability near wellbore or adjacent to fracture wings. The damage to permeability caused by invasion of liquid into tight formation is controlled by capillary pressure and relative permeability curves.

The phase trap damage is one of the main concerns in use of water based drilling or fracturing fluid, since due to high critical water saturation, strong capillary pressure, and sensitivity of tight sand to water. Therefore, use of oil based mud may be preferred in drilling or fracturing of tight formation. However invasion of oil filtrate into tight formation may result in a three-phase relative permeability curves in invaded zone in presence of reservoir gas and initial water, which may differently affect damage and productivity of tight gas reservoirs.

This study evaluates phase trap damage in water-based in comparison with oil-based drilled or fractured tight gas reservoir. Reservoir simulation is used to study the effect of relative permeability curves on phase trap damage and well productivity, based on reservoir and core data from a West Australian tight gas reservoir. The results highlights benefits of using oil-based fluids in drilling and fracturing of tight gas reservoirs in term of improving well productivity.