Experimental Simulation Of Hydrocarbon Expulsion

Schwark, L. (Kiel University) | Stockhausen, M. (Kiel University) | Galimberti, R. (Eni SPA E&P Division) | Elias, R. (ENI E&P Division)

OnePetro 

Abstract

Laboratory studies simulating thermal maturation of source rocks to generate and expel oil/gas differ from natural conditions. Amounts and compositions of products deviate between experiments and those found in natural petroleum source, carrier and reservoir rocks. Experimental data used in numerical models simulating oil/gas generation/expulsion thus seem to require adaption, causing significant uncertainty in present petroleum systems analysis. We designed and tested a procedure to simulate laboratory generation and expulsion of hydrocarbons under conditions most similar to natural conditions.

Problem identification

The critical factors in combined petroleum generation and expulsion simulation studies are: i) the pore and kerogen network of a sediment must remain as closely as possible in its natural state, as destroyed pore-systems are unsuitable for interpretation due to artificial reaction sites and migration avenues created upon experiment; ii) kerogen maturation must occur in the presence of water, as water acts as hydrogen donor for oil/gas formation and via hydrostatic pressure and associated flow stimulates migration of oil/gas; consequently, dry pyrolysis often used in petroleum generation experiments for kinetics calculation will not reflect near-natural oil/gas expulsion; iii) pressure regimes applied upon experiment must mimic differentially the lithostatic and hydrostatic pressures, as lithostatic squeezing will cause collapse of clay mineral aggregates but opposes kerogen swelling in non-lithified rocks; consequently experiments under all-directional identical confining pressures are unsuitable to reflect oil/gas expulsion; iv) the generated and then expelled oil/gas fluids must be allowed to migrate in the given pressure and permeability regime in order to avoid artificial secondary reactions, including condensation as well as cracking, hence rendering closed pyrolysis unsuitable for many petroleum expulsion studies. Exceptional cases may include tight shales, where expulsion is hindered or burial of reservoirs associated with oil to gas cracking.