The objective of the project is to reconcile and quantify the impact of geological and completion variables that cause significant EUR differences in two recent wells drilled and completed in the Uteland Butte member of the Green River formation in Uinta Basin, Utah. While the geology and reservoir conditions are similar for both wells, the completion design and parameters are different (Ball-and-Sleeve vs. Plug-and-Perf, job size, treatment rates, well length, etc.).
The Asset Team uses a structured workflow consisting of several modeling tools: Rate-Transient-Analysis (RTA), Frac Modeling (FM) and Reservoir Simulation (RS) to address and quantify the impact of each variable: Job size, Treatment Rate, Frac count per Stage, Well Length and the effect of clays.
The workflow began with a performance evaluation of the high EUR well (Plug-and-Perf, large job) with RTA and Frac modeling; followed by history-match and prediction of the EUR with the RS model. In the subsequent workflow, a single variable is changed in each modeling step, while others are held constant -- as such, the EUR impact for each variable can be quantified. The result from each step is calibrated with the actual performance observed in the field.
This model-based approach successfully quantified the production impact of each variable. Subsequently, the key drivers can be determined which explains the estimated EUR difference between the two wells. This work drives us to conclude that due to varying pressure, PVT and lithology across the field, different completion designs shall be utilized. The team has gained valuable insight on how to implement different completion techniques with varying job size and design for the basin. Currently, these results are used to drive the well designs and approval; with the long-term objective of optimizing the Field Development Plan.