Produced-Water-Chemistry History Matching in the Janice Field

Vazquez, Oscar (Heriot Watt University ) | Young, Callum (Maersk Oil) | Demyanov, Vasily (Heriot-Watt University) | Arnold, Dan (Heriot-Watt University) | Fisher, Andrew (Maersk Oil) | MacMillan, Alasdair (Maersk Oil) | Christie, Michael (Heriot-Watt University)

OnePetro 

Chloride concentration is used to evaluate the seawater fraction of the total produced water per producing well and is included as an extra history-matching constraint to reevaluate a good conventionally history-matched (HM) reservoir model for the Janice field. Generally, PWC is not included in conventional history matching, and this approach shows the value of considering the nature of the seawater-injection front and the associated brine mixing between the distinctive formation water and injected seawater. Adding the extra constraint resulted in the reconceptualization of the reservoir geology between a key injector and two producers. The transmissibility of a shale layer is locally modified within a range of geologically consistent values. Also, a major lineament is identified which is interpreted as a northwest/southeasttrending fault, whereby the zero transmissibility of a secondary shale in the Middle Fulmar is locally adjusted to allow crossflow. Both uncertainties are consistent with the complex faulting known to exist in the region of the targeted wells. Finally, a stochastic particle-swarm-optimization (PSO) algorithm is used to generate an ensemble of HM models with seawater fraction as an extra constraint in the misfit definition. Use of additional data in history matching has improved the original good HM solution.