![]()
ABSTRACT This study investigates the performance of docking operation in float-over installation. A series of model tests were performed at the Ocean Engineering Basin of the Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO). The condition that one-fourth of the transportation vessel carrying the topside enters the jacket slot was tested. During the test, the vessel motion, line tensions, and fender forces were measured under various irregular wave headings i.e. head sea and beam sea. The relation between the vessel surge motion and line tension was investigated under head sea waves. Wave period effects were also studied in the condition of peak period 5s to 8s. To validate the experimental data, numerical simulations were performed. Numerical additional damping was found the main factor for surge motion in head sea condition. The relation between the sway and yaw motion of the vessel and tension of lines was discussed in beam sea waves. Fender effects were also studied in these conditions. Response characteristics about fender forces and the vessel motion relatively well implemented in the numerical simulations.
INTRODUCTION There are two methods for the installation of a topside in offshore. Due to the limitation of allowable lifting weight in lifting operations, float-over operations had been used to install the heavy integrated topside. Float-over scenarios are typically divided into five parts : Stand by, Alignment, Docking, Mating and Undocking stage. Mating stage is the most important stage in topside load transfer and dynamic load of hardware such as LMU, DSU. Docking stage is the significant stage like mating stage. It is the sensitive stages related to operability and workability in float-over installation. Mating, mooring lines and fenders were used to help the entry of a transportation vessel in docking stage. Jillian Duquesnay et al., (2013) addressed docking and undocking considerations for float-over analyses and operations. The considerations are float-over procedure, hardware, slot configuration, weather, workability, tides, mooring and mating lines. According to slot configuration i.e. tight slot and loose slot, complexity of float-over hardware and component can be different. A complex fender system is required in tight slot condition. Whereas LMUs, DSUs, mating lines and mooring system is less complex due to restricted lateral motion in this condition.