|Theme||Visible||Selectable||Appearance||Zoom Range (now: 0)|
Brinkley, Kourtney (Devon Energy) | Ingle, Trevor (Devon Energy) | Haffener, Jackson (Devon Energy) | Chapman, Philip (Devon Energy) | Baker, Scott (Devon Energy) | Hart, Eric (Devon Energy) | Haustveit, Kyle (Devon Energy) | Roberts, Jon (Devon Energy)
Abstract This case study details the use of Sealed Wellbore Pressure Monitoring (SWPM) to improve the characterization of fracture geometry and propagation during stimulation of inter-connected stacked pay in the South Texas Eagle Ford Shale. The SWPM workflow utilizes surface pressure gauges to detect hydraulically induced fracture arrivals athorizontal monitor locations adjacent to the stimulated wellbore (Haustveit et al. 2020). A stacked and staggered development in Dewitt County provided the opportunity to jointly evaluateprimary completion and recompletion efforts spanning three reservoir target intervals. Fivemonitor wells at varying distances across the unit were employed for SWPM during the stimulation of four wells. An operational overview, analysis of techniques, correlation with seismic attributes, image log interpretations, and fracture model calibration are provided. Outputs from this workflow allow for a refined analysis ofthe overall completion strategy. The high-density, five well monitor array recorded a total of 160 fracture arrivals at varying vertical and lateral distances, with far-field fracture arrivalsprovidingsignificant insight into propagation rates and geometry. Apronounced trend occurred in both arrival frequency and volumes pumped as monitor locations increased in distance from the treatment well. Specific to target zone isolation, it was identified that traversing vertically in section through a high stress interval yielded a 30% reduction inarrival frequency. An indirect relationship between horizontal distance and arrival frequency was also observed when monitoring from the same interval. A decrease in fracture arrivals from 70% down to 8% was realized as offset distance increased from 120 to 1,700 ft. The results from this study have proven to be instrumental in guiding interdisciplinary discussion. Assessing fracture geometry and propagation during stimulation, particularly in the co-development of a stacked pay reservoir, is paramount to the determination of proper completion volume, perforation design, and well spacing. Leveraging the observations of SWPM ultimately provides greater confidence in field development strategy and economic optimization.
Abstract In multi-stage plug-and-perf horizontal well completions, there are a multitude of moving parts and variables to consider when evaluating performance drivers. Properly identifying performance drivers allows an operator to focus their efforts to maximize the rate of return of resource development. Typically, well-to-well comparisons are made to help identify performance drivers, but in many cases the differences are not clear. Identifying these drivers may require a better understanding of performance variability along a single lateral. Data analytics can help to identify performance drivers using existing data from development activities. In the case study below, multiple diagnostics are utilized to identify performance drivers. A combination of completion diagnostics including oil and water tracers, stimulation data, reservoir data, 3D seismic, and borehole image logs were collected on a set of wells in the early appraisal phase of a field. Using oil tracers as the best indication of stage level performance along the laterals, data analytics is applied to uncover the relationships between the tracers and the numerous diagnostics. After smoothing was applied to the dataset, trends between oil tracer recovery, several independent variables and features seen in image logs and 3D seismic were identified. All the analyses pointed to decreasing tracer recovery, and likely decreased oil production, near faulted areas along each lateral. A random forest model showed a moderate prediction power, where the model's predicted tracer recovery on blind stages was able to explain 54% of the variance seen in the tracer response (r=0.54). This analysis suggests the identification of certain faulted areas along the wellbore could lead to ways of improving individual well economics by adjusting completion design in these areas.
Haustveit, Kyle (Devon Energy) | Elliott, Brendan (Devon Energy) | Haffener, Jackson (Devon Energy) | Ketter, Chris (Devon Energy) | O'Brien, Josh (Devon Energy) | Almasoodi, Mouin (Devon Energy) | Moos, Sheldon (Devon Energy) | Klaassen, Trevor (Devon Energy) | Dahlgren, Kyle (Devon Energy) | Ingle, Trevor (Devon Energy) | Roberts, Jon (Devon Energy) | Gerding, Eric (Devon Energy) | Borell, Jarret (Devon Energy) | Sharma, Sundeep (Devon Energy) | Deeg, Wolfgang (Formerly Devon Energy)
Over the past decade the shale revolution has driven a dramatic increase in hydraulically stimulated wells. Since 2010, hundreds of thousands of hydraulically fractured stages have been completed on an annual basis in the US alone. It is well known that the geology and geomechanical features vary along a lateral due to landing variations, structural changes, depletion impacts, and intra-well shadowing. The variations along a lateral have the potential to impact the fluid distribution in a multi-cluster stimulation which can impact the drainage pattern and ultimately the economics of the well and unit being exploited. Due to the lack of low-cost, scalable diagnostics capable of monitoring cluster efficiency, most wells are completed using geometric cluster spacing and the same pump schedule across a lateral with known variations.
A breakthrough patent-pending pressure monitoring technique using an offset sealed wellbore as a monitoring source has led to advancements in quantifying cluster efficiencies of hydraulic stimulations in real-time. To date, over 1,500 stages have been monitored using the technique. Sealed Wellbore Pressure Monitoring (SWPM) is a low-cost, non-intrusive method used to evaluate and quantify fracture growth rates and fracture driven interactions during a hydraulic stimulation. The measurements can be made with only a surface pressure gauge on a monitor well.
SWPM provides insight into a wide range of fracture characteristics and can be applied to improve the understanding of hydraulic fractures in the following ways: Qualitative cluster efficiency/fluid distribution Fracture count in the far-field Fracture height and fracture half-length Depletion identification and mitigation Fracture model calibration Fracture closure time estimation
Qualitative cluster efficiency/fluid distribution
Fracture count in the far-field
Fracture height and fracture half-length
Depletion identification and mitigation
Fracture model calibration
Fracture closure time estimation
The technique has been validated using low frequency Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) strain monitoring, microseismic monitoring, video-based downhole perforation imaging, and production logging. This paper will review multiple SWPM case studies collected from projects performed in the Anadarko Basin (Meramec), Permian Delaware Basin (Wolfcamp), and Permian Delaware Basin (Leonard/Avalon).
Fluid injection operations and the connected increase in pore pressure can have undesirable side effects such as induced seismic activity, fault slip and wellbore damage. Here, we present two statistical methods that allow for an identification of fault activation and induced seismic activity. First, we differentiate induced from tectonic seismicity based on a significant increase in background seismicity rates. We determine temporal variations in background rates by fitting earthquake interevent-times with a two-parametric gamma distribution. The corresponding parameters provide insight into short-period aftershock clustering and longer period background seismicity rate changes. We show that temporal changes in background rates can be used to identify regions with induced seismicity in the central United. Second, we identify fault activation processes by analyzing temporal variations in Gutenberg-Richter
Presentation Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Start Time: 8:00:00 AM
Location: Lobby D/C
Presentation Type: POSTER