Copyright 2013, Society of Petroleum Engineers This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2-4 July 2013. This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright. Abstract Chemical injection in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects is a complex process because it involves multiple chemicals with complex fluids. Costs for even a small-scale pilot test could be up in the millions of US dollars (USD) and large-scale fieldwide expansion would be in the 100s of millions USD for onshore projects. Costs for offshore projects would increase by multiple folds compared to onshore projects with comparable sizes. This paper discusses (1) conventional designs for small-or large-scale injection facilities, (2) recent improvements in conventional designs, and (3) new concepts in chemical injection facility designs that can improve the quality, lower the cost, and reduce the lead time in the implementation of chemical EOR (CEOR) projects. Introduction Major CEOR processes can be classified into two categories: polymer applications and surfactant processes. Polymer applications include polymer flooding (PF), and polymer gels for profile modification and water shut-off.