Layer | Fill | Outline |
---|
Map layers
Theme | Visible | Selectable | Appearance | Zoom Range (now: 0) |
---|
Fill | Stroke |
---|---|
Collaborating Authors
Oil & Gas
Ultralow-Interfacial-Tension Foam Injection Strategy Investigation in High Temperature Ultra-High Salinity Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
Dong, Pengfei (Rice University) | Puerto, Maura (Rice University) | Ma, Kun (Total) | Mateen, Khalid (Total) | Ren, Guangwei (Total) | Bourdarot, Gilles (Total) | Morel, Danielle (Total) | Biswal, Sibani Lisa (Rice University) | Hirasaki, George (Rice University)
Abstract Oil recovery in many carbonate reservoirs is challenging due to unfavorable conditions such as oil-wet surface wettability, high reservoir heterogeneity and high brine salinity. We present the feasibility and injection strategy investigation of ultralow-interfacial-tension (ultralow-IFT) foam in a high temperature (above 80°C), ultra-high formation salinity (above 23% TDS) fractured carbonate reservoir. Because a salinity gradient is generated between injection sea water (4.2% TDS) and formation brine (23% TDS), a frontal-dilution map was created to simulate frontal displacement processes and thereafter used to optimize surfactant formulations. IFT measurements and bulk foam tests were also conducted to study the salinity gradient effect to ultralow-IFT foam performance. Ultralow-IFT foam injection strategies were investigated through a series of core flood experiments in both homogenous and fractured core systems with initial two-phase saturation. The representative fractured system included a well-defined fracture by splitting core sample lengthwise and controllable initial oil/brine saturation in the matrix by closing the fracture with a rubber sheet at high confining pressure. The surfactant formulation showed ultra-low IFT (10-10 mN/m magnitude) at the displacement front and good foamability at under-optimum conditions. Both ultralow-IFT and foamability properties were found to be sensitive to the salinity gradient. Ultralow-IFT foam flooding achieved over 60% incremental oil recovery compared to water flooding in oil-wet fractured systems due to the selective diversion of ultralow-IFT foam. This effect resulted in crossflow near foam front, with surfactant solution (or weak foam) primarily diverted from the fracture into the matrix before the foam front, and oil/high-salinity brine flowed back to the fracture ahead of the front. The crossflow of oil/high-salinity brine from the matrix to the fracture was found to make it challenging for foam propagation in the fractured system by forming Winsor II condition near foam front and hence killing the existing foam. Results in this work demonstrated the feasibility of ultralow-IFT foam in high temperature, ultra-high salinity fractured carbonate reservoirs and investigated the injection strategy to enhance the low-IFT foam performance. The ultralow-IFT formulation helped mobilize the residual oil for better displacement efficiency. The selective diversion of foam makes it a good candidate as a mobility control agent in fractured system for better sweep efficiency.
- Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
- Materials > Chemicals > Commodity Chemicals > Petrochemicals (0.46)
- Europe > United Kingdom > North Sea > Central North Sea > South Viking Graben > Blocks 16/7b > Miller Field (0.93)
- Europe > United Kingdom > North Sea > Central North Sea > South Viking Graben > Block 16/8b > Miller Field (0.93)
Designing and Injecting a Chemical Formulation for a Successful Off-Shore Chemical EOR Pilot in a High-Temperature, High-Salinity, Low-Permeability Carbonate Field
Levitt, David (Total) | Klimenko, Alexandra (Total) | Jouenne, Stephane (Total) | Passade-Boupat, Nicolas (Total) | Cordelier, Philippe (Total) | Morel, Danielle (Total) | Bourrel, Maurice (Total)
Abstract This article describes the formulation design, optimization, implementation, and lessons learned leading up to a successful 1-spot surfactant-polymer (SP) pilot in the Middle East. The target field is a high-temperature, high-salinity, low-permeability carbonate, and thus presents both great challenges and great potential for the application of chemical EOR technology. A surfactant-polymer (SP) formulation was optimized for these conditions based upon a novel, hydrophilicity-enhanced molecule for high-temperature, high-salinity reservoirs synthesized by Total R&D labs. Thermal stability tests, over 5000 microemulsion pipette tests, and more than 40 corefloods were performed during the screening and optimization process leading up to the 1-spot SP pilot. Additionally, a novel method was developed to optimize polymer molecular weight distribution, in order to decouple in-situ viscosity from near-wellbore injectivity. The final formulation consists of a 0.4 pore volume (PV) SP slug of 1.35% active surfactant, plus 1% clarifier, and SAV-225 polymer (SNF Floerger) in a 80 g/l brine corresponding to a hypothetical softened mixture of seawater and local aquifer water. This is followed by a polymer drive of AN-125 polymer (SNF Floerger) in softened seawater, such that a negative salinity gradient is imposed between the 230 g/l formation brine, 80 g/l SP slug, and 42 g/l seawater. The formulation was designed and implemented without need for a preflush. Residual oil saturation to chemicals (Sorc) in analog limestone cores was measured as 5%±2%, corresponding to a recovery factor (RF) of 90%±4%. Reservoir limestone contains significant heterogeneity on the core-scale, likely preventing the formation of an oil bank, and thus yielded lower recoveries (Sorc: 13%±2%, RF: 84%±4%). One-spot pilot recovery corresponded closely to recovery in analog cores (Sorc: 4%, RF = 90%, Al-Amrie et al., 2015), suggesting that the reason for the lower recovery in reservoir cores was in fact due to the short core length with respect to the mixing zone, as suggested in a previous publication (Levitt et al., 2012).
- Asia > Middle East (0.88)
- North America > United States > Montana > Roosevelt County (0.25)
- Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
- Materials > Chemicals > Commodity Chemicals > Petrochemicals (0.69)