Layer | Fill | Outline |
---|
Map layers
Theme | Visible | Selectable | Appearance | Zoom Range (now: 0) |
---|
Fill | Stroke |
---|---|
Collaborating Authors
Results
Abstract Low recovery of fracturing water is partly due to fracturing fluid leak-off into formation and water trapping in matrix. In our previous studies (Soleiman Asl et al. 2019 and Yuan et al. 2019), we showed that using surfactant solutions in fracturing fluid can significantly enhance imbibition oil recovery. However, there is one critical question remained unanswered: What are the consequences of these additives on well performance during flowback and post-flowback processes? Can they block the pore-throats of rock matrix and induce formation damage? To answer this question, we develop and apply a comprehensive laboratory protocol on a tight core plug to simulate leak-off and flowback processes under reservoir pressure, with and without initial water saturation (Swi). We evaluate the possibility of pore-throat blockage by comparing pore-throat size distribution of the core plug and size distribution of the particles formed in a microemulsion (ME) solution. We also investigate the effects of Swi on effective oil permeability (ko) after the flowback process. The results of leak-off and flowback tests using tap water as the base case shows that ko after flowback is lower than that before the leak-off, mainly due to phase trapping. However, results of the tests using the ME solution show that ko after flowback is greater than ko before leak-off. This observation suggests that the leak-off of ME solution enhances regained oil relative permeability during flowback by reducing phase trapping and water blockage. When Swi = 0, the blockage of leaked-off fluid reduces ko during the flowback process. The mean size of self-assembled structures (referred to as "particles" here) formed by mixing the ME solution with water is around 10-20 nm. The MICP profile of the core sample shows that around 95% of pore throats are bigger than the size of formed particles, suggesting low chance of pore-throat blockage by the suspended particles.
- North America > Canada > Alberta (0.93)
- North America > United States (0.68)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia (0.68)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (0.93)
- Geology > Mineral > Silicate (0.70)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock (0.69)
- North America > United States > South Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > North Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Montana > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- (5 more...)
Abstract In this paper, we evaluate the idea of adding nanoparticles (NPs) in fracturing water to enhance its wetting affinity to oil-wet pores and to mobilize part of the oil during the extended shut-in periods. We analyzed the performance of two different nanoparticle additives (NP1 and NP2) on core plugs collected from the Montney Formation. Additive 1 is a colloidal dispersion with highly surface-modified NPs and additive 2 is a micellar dispersion with highly surface-modified silicon dioxide NPs, solvents and surfactants. The proposed methodology consists of the following steps: 1) Characterizing wettability of the candidate rock samples under different conditions of brine salinity and NP concentrations through dynamic contact-angle measurements, 2) Evaluating NP-assisted imbibition oil recovery during the shut-in period by conducting systematic counter-current imbibition tests, and 3) Evaluating pore accessibility by comparing the mean size of the particles formed in the NP solutions measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) method with pore-throat size distribution of the core plugs obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) analyses. The dynamic contact-angle results show that the core plugs are oil-wet in the presence of reservoir brine and fresh water as base fluids, and water-wet in the presence of the NP solutions. Consistently, the measured oil recovery factor (RF) by the NP solutions is 5% to 10% higher than that by the base fluids, which can be explained by the wettability alteration by NPs. Comparing the mean particle size of the NP solutions with the pore-throat size distribution of the plugs evaluates pore accessibility of core plugs. From MICP and SEM analyses, most pores of the rock samples have pore-throat radius in the range of 4 to 100 nm. The mean particle size of NP1 in low-salinity water is less than 30 nm while that of NP2 in low-salinity water is around 40 nm. The NPs can pass through most of the pore throats under low-salinity conditions. This is supported by fast and spontaneous imbibition of the NP solutions into the oil-saturated core plugs, compared with the base cases without the NPs solutions. When salinity increases, the particle size for NP solutions increases to more than 200 nm. Therefore, fewer pores may be accessed by NPs under high-salinity conditions if the NP solutions are not optimized for such conditions.
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.84)
- Geology > Mineral (1.00)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (0.93)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock > Mudrock (0.47)
- North America > United States > South Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > North Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Montana > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- (2 more...)
Boosting Oil Recovery in Unconventional Resources Utilizing Wettability Altering Agents: Successful Translation from Laboratory to Field
Kazempour, Mahdi (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Kiani, Mojtaba (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Nguyen, Duy (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Salehi, Mehdi (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Bidhendi, Mehrnoosh Moradi (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Lantz, Mike (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company)
Abstract In recent years, the United States (US) has experienced a resurrection in hydrocarbon recovery owing to the extraction of oil and gas from unconventional resources. Due to the ultra-low permeability nature of these reservoirs and their oil-wet characteristics, oil production declines are steep and oil recoveries remain very low (< 12% of OOIP). This challenge endures even with the assistance of hydraulic fracturing advancements and well spacing optimizations. The billions of barrels of remaining oil is a good target for chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies. In this study, after comprehensive laboratory testing, a series of customized chemical formulations was developed to improve oil recovery under the challenging conditions of the Middle Bakken and Niobrara formations (temperature >110 ยฐC, salinity>220,000 ppm, and hardness>15,000 ppm). To examine the performance of the selected formulation in the field-scale, a single well enhancement trial was carried out. A detailed review of the lab and field data (pre-and post- treatment) is discussed in this study. Oil rate decline analysis and numerical simulations were used to obtain more insight about the true effectiveness of the chemical treatments. The results of this field trial reveal that injecting a proper wettability altering agent can improve oil recovery from shale oil reservoirs by up to 25% of the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). The results of numerical simulations also show that the additional oil recovered in this field trial cannot be achieved by either well shut-in or straight water injection. The lessons learned from this study provide practical information to optimize similar field trial designs leading to more profitable projects. The concepts and information here can be also translated to other unconventional basins and gas condensate or wet/dry gas reservoirs.
- Geology > Mineral (1.00)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (1.00)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock > Mudrock > Shale (0.36)
- North America > United States > West Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- (40 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Shale oil (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Naturally-fractured reservoirs (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- (5 more...)
Abstract The goal of this work is to develop surfactant systems that can improve oil flow from shale wells after fracturing or re-fracturing. Surfactants can reduce oil-water interfacial tension and wettability of the shale, which in turn can improve water imbibition, increase oil relative permeability and reduce water blockage at the matrix-fracture interface. Temperature in typical shale reservoirs are high and the surfactants need to be aqueous stable to be effective in these treatments. Mixing two surfactants often gives higher aqueous stability than those of the single surfactants. A large number of surfactants (anionic, non-ionic and cationic) and their blends were studied for aqueous stability, contact angle and spontaneous imbibition. Seven single surfactants and nine surfactant blends were found to be stable in both high and low salinity brines at 125 ยฐC. All aqueous stable blends changed wettability of oil-wet shale to preferentially water-wet in both high and low salinity brines. Seven single surfactants and five surfactant blends were tested for imbibition. Surfactant solutions improved water imbibition to the extent of 20% PV. Surfactant blends improved imbibition more than the single surfactants. Imbibition in cores reached a plateau in about 3 days. Surfactant blends have the potential to be used in low salinity fracturing or refracturing fluids to stimulate shale wells.
Abstract The application of surfactants to improve oil recovery in conventional reservoirs via wettability alteration and enhancement of spontaneous imbibition has been extensively studied in the literature. However, little work has been performed yet to investigate the interaction of these surfactants with ultra-tight oil-rich shale reservoirs such as Wolfcamp shale. The use of horizontal drilling and massive multistage hydraulic fracturing has made primary oil recovery from these ultra-tight oil-rich shale reservoirs possible. With declining production from existing shale wells, it is essential to explore potential "beyond primary" strategies in shale oil development. This paper analyzes the potential of surfactants in altering wettability and improving the process of spontaneous imbibition in oil rich shales demonstrating nanodarcy range permeability, relevant to stimulation and "beyond primary" chemical EOR applications in shales. Novel proprietary surfactant blends along with traditional nonionic surfactants were investigated in this study using Wolfcamp shale core samples exhibiting nanodarcy permeability. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed which indicated that Wolfcamp shale has mixed mineralogy, with quartz, calcite, and dolomite acting as the major minerals in varying proportions depending on the interval depth. Contact angle and interfacial tension measurements were performed at reservoir temperature to identify the state of native wettability and the impact of surfactants in altering wettability. Thereafter, spontaneous imbibition experiments were performed using 3D computed tomography methods to understand the improvement in the magnitude of imbibition penetration due to surfactant addition. Contact angle and spontaneous imbibition experiments showed that Wolfcamp shale is intermediate-wet and surfactants have the potential to alter the native wettability to a preferentially water-wet state and improve oil recovery due to enhanced spontaneous imbibition. Surfactants which altered the wettability significantly, but lowered the interfacial tension only slightly showed the highest oil recoveries due to the creation of strong capillary driven forces directly responsible for effective spontaneous imbibition. The potential of surfactants in altering wettability and improving oil recovery via enhanced spontaneous imbibition in ultra-tight oil-rich shales was verified in this study. The effectiveness of traditional nonionic surfactants in altering wettability and improving oil recovery was found to be comparable to that of novel, more expensive proprietary surfactant blends, and hence, the traditional nonionic surfactants provide a cost effective option for stimulation and EOR applications in Wolfcamp shale. Overall, this paper presents the theory behind surfactant interaction with ultra-tight shales and provides experimental results to validate the viability of surfactant induced improved oil recovery in shales.
- North America > United States > Texas (1.00)
- North America > United States > New Mexico (1.00)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (29 more...)