Layer | Fill | Outline |
---|
Map layers
Theme | Visible | Selectable | Appearance | Zoom Range (now: 0) |
---|
Fill | Stroke |
---|---|
Collaborating Authors
Results
SUMMARY Mapping, localization, and general characterization of problems in reservoir fracture systems is one of the most important in oil, gas, and geothermal energy production. One way to study and monitor these fracture systems is to analyze the microearthquakes triggered during hydraulic fracturing or stimulation, as these events generally occur along newly created and preexisting fractures. Thus, the location of the microseismic events can be used to characterize the properties of the fracture system. There are many different methods for localizing microearthquakes and, in general, these methods yield different locations, velocity models, and event origin times, due to differences in algorithms and input models. This makes it very difficult to know which one gives the most accurate and consistent results in practice. The goal of this work is to use basic concepts from seismic interferometry for estimating constraints on the P and S traveltimes between two microearthquake locations. Information obtained through seismic interferometry pertains to only the Earth parameters between two receivers or, by reciprocity, two sources. This information is also less dependent on the velocity model, and less susceptible to errors in arrival time picking and noise in the data due to averaging over receivers. This information can then be used to evaluate and compare different sets of results obtained through different localization methods. Here we illustrate this comparison method by comparing localization results from two different methods. For our data set, in particular, seismic interferometry cannot give hard constrains but it gives bounds that can be used to asses results from different localization methods.
Target-Oriented Time-Lapse Waveform Inversion Using Virtual Survey
Yang, Di (MIT) | Zheng, Yingcai (MIT) | Fehler, Michael (MIT) | Malcolm, Alison (MIT)
SUMMARY Time-lapse seismic data are widely used for monitoring time-variant subsurface changes. Conventional analysis provides qualitative information by comparing results from consecutive surveys, whereas waveform inversion can retrieve quantitative estimates of reservoir properties through seismic waveform fitting. The quantitative evaluation of the physical parameters obtained by waveform inversion allows for better interpretation of fluid substitution and migration during processes like oil and gas production, and carbon sequestration. Since reservoir changes are localized and only part of the data are of interest, the time-lapse waveform inversion can be optimized in terms of computational cost and convergence rate. In this study, we propose a scheme of localized waveform inversion with computed datasets we refer to as virtual surveys. Both the model domain and trace duration in forward modeling are reduced by the reorganization of the data. We show a numerical example in which the recovery of the reservoir change is computationally faster and more robust to source-receiver locations than inversion with original survey.
SEAM Phase I RPSEA is in the process of completing a suite of geophysical simulations on the geophysical model representative of a salt area of the deep-water Gulf of Mexico. Part of this interdisciplinary effort includes the simulation of two types of electromagnetic acquisitions over the SEAM model, one for a controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) and one for magnetotelluric (MT). Both CSEM and MT 3D modeling and imaging technologies are of intense interest to companies conducting exploration and reservoir development in marine environments. SEAM's goal is to provide 3D electromagnetic data that not only mimic current field acquisitions but, in most cases, far exceed them. The resulting simulation data can be used to validate and ultimately improve 3D EM forward modeling as well as subsurface imaging and characterization methods using electromagnetic data alone or when combined with other types of geophysical data.
- North America > United States (0.35)
- North America > Mexico (0.25)
- Geophysics > Seismic Surveying (1.00)
- Geophysics > Electromagnetic Surveying (0.93)
SEAM is continuing its effort to obtain a full suite of geophysical simulations over the SEAM Phase I Deepwater model. Isotropic acoustic, controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM), and gravity simulations have been completed. We are now conducting acoustic simulations on an anisotropic version of the SEAM model.
- Asia (0.29)
- North America > United States (0.25)
- North America > Mexico (0.25)
Abstract Geophysical imaging and subsurface characterization for offshore petroleumexploration and reservoir characterization face increasingly demandingrequirements for reliability and for providing increased information about theearth's subsurface. New methods for data acquisition, data processing andsimultaneous analysis of multiple types of geophysical datasets (e.g. seismic, EM, gravity) are helping to meet these challenges but there is need to testthese methods and to quantify their robustness. Testing and evaluation of newmethods can be done using simulated benchmark datasets provided the simulationsare calculated using realistic models and that the simulation methodology iswell validated. The benchmark datasets must not only be reliably calculated butthey must be sufficiently large to mimic state-of-the-art fieldacquisitions. The SEG Advanced Modeling Project (SEAM), using funding provided by theResearch Partnership to Secure Energy for America (RPSEA), has developed amodel for a deepwater region that contains a major salt body and severalpetroleum reservoirs located around and beneath the salt. Constructing andconducting geophysical simulations on the model is a challenge for currenthigh-performance computing technology. A suite of geophysical simulations isbeing conducted on the model including acoustic-wave, Tilted TransverseIsotropic acoustic, Gravity, Controlled Source Electromagnetic, Magnetotelluricand Elastic. Geophysicists are actively using these datasets to facilitatetheir development and testing of new algorithms and acquisition schemes forbetter subsurface characterization. The access to large multidisciplinarydatasets calculated on a single realistic model developed for a deepwaterregion like the Gulf of Mexico has long been desired to allow testing andbenchmarking of geophysical techniques, testing of new data acquisitionschemes, and assessing the value of multi-disciplinary inversion approaches.SEAM is seeking to provide these datasets for the geophysical community. Introduction Geophysical imaging continues to undergo transformation as new data acquisitionand processing schemes allow increasingly complex regions of the earth's crustto be imaged with better and better resolution. Advances from ray-basedmigration methods to one-way wave propagation migration and now reverse timemigration have been made possible by the availability of faster computers thathave sufficient memory to hold large models that the methods require forsuccessful application. Advances in data acquisition have provided an enormousincrease in the amount and quality of data that are available to input into thenew imaging schemes. The ability to implement imaging approaches that are basedon more than the isotropic acoustic velocity of the earth have led tosignificant improvements in image quality and the type of information that canbe obtained from images. For example, Controlled-Source Electromagnetic (CSEM)data have been found to provide valuable information not only when usedindependently of other data but also have recently been found to add tremendousvalue to interpretation when used in combination with seismic data. The recentuse of anisotropic earth models that have not only a vertical axis of symmetry, so-called vertical transverse isotropy or VTI, but that that now have aspatially-varying non-vertical axis of symmetry (Tilter Transverse Isotropy, TTI) have led to better images of complex regions like the Gulf of Mexico andprovide the opportunity to provide constraints on geomechanical models of theregion.