Layer | Fill | Outline |
---|
Map layers
Theme | Visible | Selectable | Appearance | Zoom Range (now: 0) |
---|
Fill | Stroke |
---|---|
Collaborating Authors
Texas
Polymer Stabilized Foam Rheology and Stability for Unconventional EOR Application
Griffith, Christopher (Chevron) | Jin, Julia (Chevron) | Linnemeyer, Harry (Chevron) | Pinnawala, Gayani (Chevron) | Aminzadeh, Behdad (Chevron) | Lau, Samuel (Chevron) | Kim, Do Hoon (Chevron) | Alexis, Dennis (Chevron) | Malik, Taimur (Chevron) | Dwarakanath, Varadarajan (Chevron)
Abstract It has been shownthat injecting surfactants into unconventional hydraulically fractured wells can improve oil recovery. It is hypothesized that oil recovery can be further improved by more efficiently distributing surfactants into the reservoir using foam. The challenge is that in high temperature applications (e.g., 240 F) many of these formulations may not make stable foams as they have only moderate foaming properties (short half-life). Therefore, we are evaluating polymers that can be used to improve foam stability in high temperature wells which has the potential to improve oil recovery beyond surfactant only injection.Surfactant stabilized nitrogen foams were evaluated using a foam rheometer at pressures and temperatures representative of a field pilot well. The evaluation process consisted of measuring baseline properties (foam viscosity and stability) of a surfactant stabilized foam without any added stabilizer. Next, conventional enhanced oil recovery polymers (HPAMs, modified-HPAMs, and nonionic polymers) were added at different concentrations to determine their impacts on foam stability. Our results demonstrate that inclusion of a relatively low concentration (0.05 wt% – 0.2 wt%) of polymer has a pronounced impact on foam stability. It was determined that reservoir temperature plays a key role in selecting astabilizing polymer. For example, at higher temperatures (>240 F), sulfonated HPAM polymers at just 0.2 wt% more than doubled the stability of the foam. The polymer that was selected from this lab work was tested in a foam field trial in an unconventional well. It is thought that improved foam stability could potentially help improve the distribution of surfactants in fracture network and further improve oil recovery.
- North America > United States > Texas > Fort Worth Basin > Barnett Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > South Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > North Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Montana > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
Abstract Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods have been implemented in a West Texas fractured carbonate. Due to the partially oil-wet nature of Yates field and slightly viscous oil (5-7 cP), surfactant injection was implemented to alter wettability and polymer was injected in the waterflood area to improve displacement efficiency, respectively. Single well huff-n-puff (HnP) surfactant treatments (late 1980's-today) and well-to-well pilots (1990's-2000's) have increased incremental oil production relative to base decline. Optimum surfactant chemicals were chosen based on laboratory results, reservoir performance, and economic viability. Polymer injection was carried out over a 6 year span (1983-1989) in which 55+ million pounds of polymer was injected; however the interpretation and analysis was complicated due to concurrent drilling, workover activities, and no prior waterflood development. Design parameters key to the surfactant implementation included: surfactant type and concentration, Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC), fluid saturations, oil composition, formation water salinity, fracture intensity, and treatment soak timing. Laboratory experiments included interfacial tension, contact angle, adsorption, fluid phase stability, Amott tests, and coreflooding. Numerical models were developed to help understand the sensitivity of each parameter on EOR performance and guide the design of treatments. Field implementation of surfactant included different surfactant types: anionic, non-ionic, and cationic. HnP treatments were followed by a soak period before returning the well to production and conducting flow back water analysis. Overall, HnP treatments using cationic surfactant resulted in the highest efficiency in terms of barrels of oil per kilogram of surfactant. Well-to-well tests were only conducted with non-ionic surfactants and showed mixed results. Design parameters for polymer injection such as fluid viscosity, concentration, adsorption and molecular weight were determined through coreflooding and fluid viscosity experiments. Two polymer types, high and low molecular weight, were studied and manufactured in-field and used in 200 or more injectors either continuously or alternating with produced water. Polymer injection was not effective in improving displacement efficiency in the water flood area of Yates reservoir and was suspended in 1989. The scale of field implementation and analysis of the impact of chemical injection on oil production in a massive, densely fractured carbonate field has provided valuable insight and learnings for future development and will be discussed. Other chemical EOR methods currently under investigation such as foam and other wettability altering technologies will also be discussed.
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (1.00)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Carbonate Rock (0.46)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (31 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Naturally-fractured reservoirs (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Carbonate reservoirs (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Waterflooding (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Chemical flooding methods (1.00)
Upscaling Laboratory Result of Surfactant-Assisted Spontaneous Imbibition to the Field Scale through Scaling Group Analysis, Numerical Simulation, and Discrete Fracture Network Model
Zhang, Fan (Texas A&M University) | Saputra, I. W. (Texas A&M University) | Niu, Geng (Texas A&M University) | Adel, Imad A. (Texas A&M University) | Xu, Liang (Halliburton) | Schechter, David S. (Texas A&M University)
Abstract Field experience along with laboratory evidence of spontaneous imbibition via the addition of surfactants into the completion fluid is widely believed to improve the IP and ultimate oil recovery from unconventional liquid reservoirs (ULR). During fracture treatment with surface active additives, surfactant molecules interact with the rock surface to enhance oil recovery through wettability alteration combined with interfacial tension (IFT) reduction. The change in capillary force as the wettability is altered by the surfactant leads to oil being expelled as water imbibes into the pore space. Several laboratory studies have been conducted to observe the effectiveness of surfactants on various shale plays during the spontaneous imbibition process, but there is an insufficient understanding of the physical mechanisms that allow scaling the lab results to field dimensions. In this manuscript, we review and evaluate dimensionless, analytical scaling groups to correlate laboratory spontaneous imbibition data in order to predict oil recovery at the field scale in ULR. In addition, capillary pressure curves are generated from imbibition rate theory originally developed by Mattax and Kyte (1962). The original scaling analysis was intended for understanding the rate of matrix-fracture transfer for a rising water level in a fracture-matrix system with variable matrix block sizes. Although contact angle and interfacial tension (IFT) are natural terms in scaling theory, virtually no work has been performed investigating these two properties. To that end, we present scaling analysis combined with numerical simulation to derive relative permeability curves, which will be imported into a discrete fracture network (DFN) model. We can then compare analytical scaling methods with conventional dual porosity concepts and then progressed to more sophisticated Discrete Fracture Network concepts. The ultimate goal is to develop more accurate predictive methods of the field-scale impact due to the addition of surfactants in the completion fluid. Correlated experimental workflows were developed to achieve the aforementioned objectives including contact angle (CA) and IFT at reservoir temperature. In addition, oil recovery of spontaneous imbibition experiments was recorded with time to evaluate the performance of different surfactants. Capillary pressure-based scaling is developed by modifying previously available scaling models based on available surfactant-related properties measured in the laboratory. To ensure representability of the scaling method; contact angle, interfacial tension, and ultimately spontaneous imbibition experiments were performed on field-retrieved samples and used as a base for developing a new scaling analysis by considering dimensionless recovery and time. Based on the capillary pressure curves obtained from the scaling model, relative permeability is approximated through a history matching procedure on core-scale numerical models. CT-Scan technology is used to build the numerical core plug model in order to preserve the heterogeneity of the unconventional core plugs and visualize the process of water imbibition in the core plugs. Time-lapse saturation changes are recorded using the CT scanner to visualize penetration of the aqueous phase into oil-saturated core samples. The capillary and relative permeability curves can then be used on DFN realizations to test cases with or without surfactant. The results of spontaneous imbibition showed that surfactant solutions had a higher oil recovery due to wettability alteration combined with IFT reduction. Our upscaling results indicate that all three methods can be used to scale laboratory results to the field. When compared to a well without surfactant additives, the optimum 3-year cumulative oil production of well that is treated with surfactant can increase by more than 20%.
- Geology > Mineral (0.46)
- Geology > Petroleum Play Type > Unconventional Play (0.34)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (25 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Simulation > Scaling methods (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Formation Evaluation & Management (1.00)
- Information Technology > Mathematics of Computing (0.71)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (0.40)
Surfactant Pre-Floods during CO2 Foam for Integrated Enhanced Oil Recovery in Fractured Oil-Wet Carbonates
Fredriksen, S. B. (University of Bergen) | Alcorn, Z. P. (University of Bergen) | Frøland, A.. (University of Bergen) | Viken, A.. (University of Bergen) | Rognmo, A. U. (University of Bergen) | Seland, J. G. (University of Bergen) | Ersland, G.. (University of Bergen) | Fernø, M. A. (University of Bergen) | Graue, A.. (University of Bergen)
Abstract An integrated enhanced oil recovery (IEOR) approach is presented for fractured oil-wet carbonate reservoirs using surfactant pre-floods to alter wettability, establish conditions for capillary continuity and improve tertiary CO2 foam injections. Surfactant pre-floods, prior to CO2 foam injection, alter the wettability of fracture surface towards weakly water-wet conditions to reduce the capillary threshold pressure for foam generation in matrix and create capillary contact between matrix blocks. The capillary connectivity transmits differential pressure across fractures and increases both mobility control and viscous displacement during CO2 foam injection. Outcrop core plugs were aged to reflect conditions of an ongoing CO2 foam field pilot in West Texas. A range of surfactants were screened for their ability to change wetting state from oil-wet to water-wet. A cationic surfactant was the most effective in shifting the moderately oil-wet cores towards weakly water-wet conditions (from an Amott-Harvey index of - 0.56 ± 0.01 to 0.09 ± 0.02), and was used for pre-floods during IEOR. When applying a surfactant pre-flood in a fractured core system, 32 ± 4% points OOIP was additionally recovered by CO2 foam injection after secondary waterflooding. We argue the enhanced oil recovery is attributed to the surfactant successfully reducing the capillary entry pressure of the oil-wet matrix providing capillary continuity and enhancing volumetric sweep during tertiary CO2 foam injection.
- North America > United States > Texas (1.00)
- Europe > United Kingdom > North Sea > Central North Sea (0.25)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (21 more...)
Abstract The goal of this work is to develop surfactant systems that can improve oil flow from shale wells after fracturing or re-fracturing. Surfactants can reduce oil-water interfacial tension and wettability of the shale, which in turn can improve water imbibition, increase oil relative permeability and reduce water blockage at the matrix-fracture interface. Temperature in typical shale reservoirs are high and the surfactants need to be aqueous stable to be effective in these treatments. Mixing two surfactants often gives higher aqueous stability than those of the single surfactants. A large number of surfactants (anionic, non-ionic and cationic) and their blends were studied for aqueous stability, contact angle and spontaneous imbibition. Seven single surfactants and nine surfactant blends were found to be stable in both high and low salinity brines at 125 °C. All aqueous stable blends changed wettability of oil-wet shale to preferentially water-wet in both high and low salinity brines. Seven single surfactants and five surfactant blends were tested for imbibition. Surfactant solutions improved water imbibition to the extent of 20% PV. Surfactant blends improved imbibition more than the single surfactants. Imbibition in cores reached a plateau in about 3 days. Surfactant blends have the potential to be used in low salinity fracturing or refracturing fluids to stimulate shale wells.
- North America > United States > Texas > West Gulf Coast Tertiary Basin > Eagle Ford Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Sabinas - Rio Grande Basin > Eagle Ford Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- (28 more...)
Abstract The application of surfactants to improve oil recovery in conventional reservoirs via wettability alteration and enhancement of spontaneous imbibition has been extensively studied in the literature. However, little work has been performed yet to investigate the interaction of these surfactants with ultra-tight oil-rich shale reservoirs such as Wolfcamp shale. The use of horizontal drilling and massive multistage hydraulic fracturing has made primary oil recovery from these ultra-tight oil-rich shale reservoirs possible. With declining production from existing shale wells, it is essential to explore potential "beyond primary" strategies in shale oil development. This paper analyzes the potential of surfactants in altering wettability and improving the process of spontaneous imbibition in oil rich shales demonstrating nanodarcy range permeability, relevant to stimulation and "beyond primary" chemical EOR applications in shales. Novel proprietary surfactant blends along with traditional nonionic surfactants were investigated in this study using Wolfcamp shale core samples exhibiting nanodarcy permeability. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed which indicated that Wolfcamp shale has mixed mineralogy, with quartz, calcite, and dolomite acting as the major minerals in varying proportions depending on the interval depth. Contact angle and interfacial tension measurements were performed at reservoir temperature to identify the state of native wettability and the impact of surfactants in altering wettability. Thereafter, spontaneous imbibition experiments were performed using 3D computed tomography methods to understand the improvement in the magnitude of imbibition penetration due to surfactant addition. Contact angle and spontaneous imbibition experiments showed that Wolfcamp shale is intermediate-wet and surfactants have the potential to alter the native wettability to a preferentially water-wet state and improve oil recovery due to enhanced spontaneous imbibition. Surfactants which altered the wettability significantly, but lowered the interfacial tension only slightly showed the highest oil recoveries due to the creation of strong capillary driven forces directly responsible for effective spontaneous imbibition. The potential of surfactants in altering wettability and improving oil recovery via enhanced spontaneous imbibition in ultra-tight oil-rich shales was verified in this study. The effectiveness of traditional nonionic surfactants in altering wettability and improving oil recovery was found to be comparable to that of novel, more expensive proprietary surfactant blends, and hence, the traditional nonionic surfactants provide a cost effective option for stimulation and EOR applications in Wolfcamp shale. Overall, this paper presents the theory behind surfactant interaction with ultra-tight shales and provides experimental results to validate the viability of surfactant induced improved oil recovery in shales.
- North America > United States > Texas (1.00)
- North America > United States > New Mexico (1.00)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (29 more...)