Layer | Fill | Outline |
---|
Map layers
Theme | Visible | Selectable | Appearance | Zoom Range (now: 0) |
---|
Fill | Stroke |
---|---|
Collaborating Authors
Results
Use of Horizontal Injectors for Improving Injectivity and Conformance in Polymer Floods
Hwang, Jongsoo (The University of Texas Austin) | Zheng, Shuang (The University of Texas Austin) | Sharma, Mukul (The University of Texas Austin) | Chiotoroiu, Maria-Magdalena (OMV Exploration & Production GmbH) | Clemens, Torsten (OMV Exploration & Production GmbH)
Abstract Several field cases have demonstrated polymer injection in a horizontal well increases oil recovery. It is important to maintain high injectivity while preventing injection-induced fractures to ensure good reservoir sweep. Our primary goal in this paper is to better understand polymer injection data from horizontal injectors in the Matzen field using a fully integrated reservoir, geomechanics, and fracturing model. By simulating polymer injection history, we present several advantages of horizontal injectors over the vertical wells. Horizontal injectors delay fracture initiation and provide better tolerance to polymer plugging on the wellbore surface. Simulations explain the measured PLT data of fluid distributions influenced by accumulated polymer deposition in multiple zones. We show that gradual injectivity decline is attributed to both polymer filter cake buildup and high-viscosity, shear-thickening zones created around the wellbore. The field case simulation also clarifies the flow distribution in different sands and how polymer rheology affects this. This distribution is found to be different than for water injection. Results from periodic acid treatments clearly show that free-flowing particles in the polymer solution are responsible for formation damage. Polymer plugging and the viscous pressure drop in the shear-thickening zone are the primary factor affecting the measured injection pressure. Based on the strong near-wellbore viscosity impact, geomechanical simulations identify reservoir zones prone to fracture growth during long-term injection, and we suggest strategies to avoid injection induced fractures that can lead to poor conformance.
- Europe (1.00)
- North America > United States > Alaska (0.28)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.28)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline > Geomechanics (1.00)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock (0.47)
- Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
- Water & Waste Management > Water Management > Lifecycle > Disposal/Injection (0.51)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (37 more...)
Comparison of Surfactant-Polymer and Polymer Flooding in a High Temperature Sandstone Reservoir
Masduki, Agus (P.T. Chevron Pacific Indonesia) | Syafwan, Muhammad (P.T. Chevron Pacific Indonesia) | Nursyahid, Bambang (P.T. Chevron Pacific Indonesia) | Armpriester, Andrew (Chevron Project Resources Company) | Dean, Robert (Ultimate EOR Inc., Formerly Chevron ETC) | Dwarakanath, Varadarajan (Chevron North America Exploration and Production) | Malik, Taimur (Chevron Energy Technology Company) | Meaux, Dwight (Saudi Arabian Chevron Inc.) | Slaughter, Will (Chevron Energy Technology Company) | Thach, Sophany (Chevron Energy Technology Company)
Abstract Results from two field trials designated as Minas Surfactant Field Trial 2 (SFT2) and Polymer Field Trial (PFT) are presented. Quantitative tracer interpretations were used to estimate sweep and displacement efficiency and confirm the performance of both SFT2 and PFT. The pilot patterns in both SFT2 and PFT consisted of a central producer surrounded by six chemical injectors and further confined by six hydraulic control wells that injected water alone. In order to make quantitative comparisons, both the surfactant-polymer and polymer pilots were run at the same mobility ratios to understand if incremental recovery was a function of improved volumetric sweep or increased displacement sweep efficiency. The results of the two pilots show that at the same well spacing and mobility ratio, incremental sweep is very similar and significantly higher than pre-chemical waterfloods. An important finding of the tracer tests is that water injectors should not be used to confine chemical injectors as the water tends to bypass the higher viscosity polymer chase and potentially disrupts the oil-bank. The results from the pilots indicate that for a mature, waterflooded reservoir, surfactant-polymer flooding was preferable as it lowered the final remaining oil saturation and increased oil recovery. Polymer flooding mainly accelerated oil recovery by recovering additional oil from unswept zones and had minimal impact in a mature reservoir. Interwell tracer technology combined with moment analyses were used to make quantitative comparisons of both processes and allowed for several technical insights. This is the first time in literature that a quantitative comparison of surfactant-polymer flooding and polymer flooding alone has been presented.
- Europe (1.00)
- Asia > Indonesia > Riau (0.28)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.28)
- Europe > United Kingdom > North Sea > Central North Sea > Moray Firth > Moray Firth Basin > Block 13/22a > Captain Field > Captain Formation (0.99)
- Europe > France > Chateaurenard Field (0.99)
- Europe > Austria > Vienna Basin > Matzen Field (0.99)
- (5 more...)