Layer | Fill | Outline |
---|
Map layers
Theme | Visible | Selectable | Appearance | Zoom Range (now: 0) |
---|
Fill | Stroke |
---|---|
Collaborating Authors
Results
Abstract Water is accumulated near the fracture surface after fracturing, which will block oil flow out. The water blockage can be mitigated through the immediate well flow back or through shutting in the well before flow back. Which method is more effective? There are mixed results in the literature from field reports and experimental or simulation studies. This paper discussed the literature results and simulation data obtained from this study. It is found that the oil recovery mainly depends on the magnitude of pressure drawdown and the strength of imbibition. When the pressure drawdown is high, immediate flow back may lead to higher oil recovery than shutting in a well before flow back. When imbibition is strong, shutting in may be beneficial to enhance oil recovery through counter-current flow. Although many parameters of reservoir properties and operations may affect the shut-in effect, those parameters may be grouped into the pressure drawdown and imbibition strength. The parameters of matrix permeability, wettability, initial water saturation, and formation compressibility are discussed. Analysis and discussion of simulation data also suggest that the oil recovery is a linear function of pressure drawdown, but the relationship between oil recovery and capillary pressure is non-linear and more complex. The results and discussion from this study suggest that the immediate flow back may outperform the shut-in if a large pressure drawdown is applied. If a reservoir provides a strong imbibition condition, the shut-in may be beneficial. Surfactants may be chosen to enhance imbibition. The surfactants which alter the reservoir from oil-wet to water-wet may be preferred.
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.54)
- North America > United States > West Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > West Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Field > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- (10 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Formation Evaluation & Management (1.00)
Abstract Low recovery of fracturing water is partly due to fracturing fluid leak-off into formation and water trapping in matrix. In our previous studies (Soleiman Asl et al. 2019 and Yuan et al. 2019), we showed that using surfactant solutions in fracturing fluid can significantly enhance imbibition oil recovery. However, there is one critical question remained unanswered: What are the consequences of these additives on well performance during flowback and post-flowback processes? Can they block the pore-throats of rock matrix and induce formation damage? To answer this question, we develop and apply a comprehensive laboratory protocol on a tight core plug to simulate leak-off and flowback processes under reservoir pressure, with and without initial water saturation (Swi). We evaluate the possibility of pore-throat blockage by comparing pore-throat size distribution of the core plug and size distribution of the particles formed in a microemulsion (ME) solution. We also investigate the effects of Swi on effective oil permeability (ko) after the flowback process. The results of leak-off and flowback tests using tap water as the base case shows that ko after flowback is lower than that before the leak-off, mainly due to phase trapping. However, results of the tests using the ME solution show that ko after flowback is greater than ko before leak-off. This observation suggests that the leak-off of ME solution enhances regained oil relative permeability during flowback by reducing phase trapping and water blockage. When Swi = 0, the blockage of leaked-off fluid reduces ko during the flowback process. The mean size of self-assembled structures (referred to as "particles" here) formed by mixing the ME solution with water is around 10-20 nm. The MICP profile of the core sample shows that around 95% of pore throats are bigger than the size of formed particles, suggesting low chance of pore-throat blockage by the suspended particles.
- North America > Canada > Alberta (0.93)
- North America > United States (0.68)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia (0.68)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (0.93)
- Geology > Mineral > Silicate (0.70)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock (0.69)
- North America > United States > South Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > North Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Montana > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- (5 more...)
Use of In-Situ CO2 Generation in Liquid-Rich Shale
Ogbonnaya, Onyekachi (University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA) | Wang, Shuoshi (Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China) | Shiau, Benjamin (University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA) | Harwell, Jeffrey (University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA)
Abstract Modified in situ CO2 generation was explored as an improved tool to deliver CO2 indirectly to the target liquid rich shale formations. Once injected, the special CO2- generating compound, urea, decomposes deep in fractures at the elevated temperature conditions, and releases significant amounts of CO2. For field implementation, the minimum surface facility is required other than simple water injection equipment. Injection of urea solution may be easier and cheaper than most gas injection approaches. In this effort, in situ CO2 treatment and designs were carried out on a group of Woodford shale core samples. The oil saturated shale cores were soaked in different urea solutions kept in pressurized (1500 and 4000 psi) and heated extraction vessels at temperature of 250 °F. The adopted treatment step closely simulates the huff-and-puff technique. A series of experiments were run with various ingredients, including brine only, brine plus surfactant, brine plus urea and ternary mixture of brine/surfactant/urea. In addition, the extraction experiments were tested at below and above MMP conditions to decipher the principal recovery mechanism. Based on our preliminary observations, the sample cores did not lose their stability after an extended period of oil extraction with in situ CO2 treatment. The urea only case could recover up to 24% of the OOIP compared to about 6% for the brine only case and 21% for the surfactant only case. Also adding a pre-selected surfactant to the urea slug did not have any benefit. There was no significant difference in oil recovery when the test pressure was below or above MMP. The main recovery mechanisms were oil swelling, viscosity reduction, low interfacial tension and wettability alteration in this effort. Multiple researchers reported successful lab scale CO2 gas extraction EOR experiments for liquid rich shale like upper, middle and lower Bakken reservoir. The best scenario could recover 90% of the OOIP from the shale core samples. The evidences of this effort offer a strong proof of concept of in situ CO2 generation potential for liquid rich shale reservoirs.
- North America > United States > Oklahoma (1.00)
- Europe (0.93)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (26 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Waterflooding (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Gas-injection methods (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Chemical flooding methods (1.00)
- (5 more...)
Abstract In this paper, we evaluate the idea of adding nanoparticles (NPs) in fracturing water to enhance its wetting affinity to oil-wet pores and to mobilize part of the oil during the extended shut-in periods. We analyzed the performance of two different nanoparticle additives (NP1 and NP2) on core plugs collected from the Montney Formation. Additive 1 is a colloidal dispersion with highly surface-modified NPs and additive 2 is a micellar dispersion with highly surface-modified silicon dioxide NPs, solvents and surfactants. The proposed methodology consists of the following steps: 1) Characterizing wettability of the candidate rock samples under different conditions of brine salinity and NP concentrations through dynamic contact-angle measurements, 2) Evaluating NP-assisted imbibition oil recovery during the shut-in period by conducting systematic counter-current imbibition tests, and 3) Evaluating pore accessibility by comparing the mean size of the particles formed in the NP solutions measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) method with pore-throat size distribution of the core plugs obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) analyses. The dynamic contact-angle results show that the core plugs are oil-wet in the presence of reservoir brine and fresh water as base fluids, and water-wet in the presence of the NP solutions. Consistently, the measured oil recovery factor (RF) by the NP solutions is 5% to 10% higher than that by the base fluids, which can be explained by the wettability alteration by NPs. Comparing the mean particle size of the NP solutions with the pore-throat size distribution of the plugs evaluates pore accessibility of core plugs. From MICP and SEM analyses, most pores of the rock samples have pore-throat radius in the range of 4 to 100 nm. The mean particle size of NP1 in low-salinity water is less than 30 nm while that of NP2 in low-salinity water is around 40 nm. The NPs can pass through most of the pore throats under low-salinity conditions. This is supported by fast and spontaneous imbibition of the NP solutions into the oil-saturated core plugs, compared with the base cases without the NPs solutions. When salinity increases, the particle size for NP solutions increases to more than 200 nm. Therefore, fewer pores may be accessed by NPs under high-salinity conditions if the NP solutions are not optimized for such conditions.
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.84)
- Geology > Mineral (1.00)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (0.93)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock > Mudrock (0.47)
- North America > United States > South Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > North Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Montana > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- (2 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Waterflooding (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Formation Evaluation & Management > Core analysis (1.00)
Abstract Decline curve analysis has been used as a reliable method to forecast conventional reservoir well production over the last decades. Recently, an increase in the demand for oil and gas has caused unconventional reservoirs to become a prominent source of energy. However, it is challenged if we still apply the decline curve analysis in unconventional reservoirs due to its limitations such as boundary dominated flow, constant operation condition, et al. Therefore, in this paper, two new methods are proposed using machine learning method to forecast well production in unconventional reservoirs, especially on the EOR pilot projects. The first method is the Neural Network, which allows the analysis of large quantities of data to discover meaningful patterns and relationships. Both peak production rate and hydraulic fracture parameters are used to be the key factors. Lastly, Neural Network technology is applied to investigate the relationship between key factors and oil production rate. The second method uses the Time Series Analysis. Time Series Analysis is one of the most applied data science techniques in business and finance. Since the properties of unconventional reservoir make the production prediction more difficult, it is safe to say that Time Series Analysis can yield good results on the production rate forecast. Field production data from over 1000 wells from different shale plays (Barnett, Bakken, Bone Springs, Eagle Ford oil, Eagle Ford gas, Fayetteville, Marcellus gas, Marcellus oil, Utica oil, and Woodford) is used to verify the feasibility of these two methods. The results indicate there is a good match between the available and predicated production data. The overall R values of Neural Network and Time Series Analysis are above 0.8, which demonstrates that Neural Network and Time Series Analysis are reliable to study the dataset and provide proper production prediction. Meanwhile, when dealing with the EOR production prediction, such as Huff-n-Puff, Time Series Analysis shows more accurate results than Neural Network. This paper proposes a thorough analysis of the feasibility of machine learning in multiple unconventional reservoirs. Instead of repeatedly fitting the production data by decline curve analysis, it also provides a more robust way and meaning reference for the evaluation of the wells.
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Shale gas (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Formation Evaluation & Management > Production forecasting (1.00)
- Production and Well Operations > Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring (1.00)
- (2 more...)
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to (1) describe the mechanisms of gas-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in tight unconventionals, and (2) emphasize the need for single-porosity model tuning of the dual-porosity model when it is used to model EOR for unconventionals on well or field scale. We study two different gas-based EOR methods that inject and produce cyclically through the same well: The Huff-n-Puff (HnP) method, and a method we will refer to as the Fracture-to-Fracture (F2F) in which every other hydraulic fracture is used for injection and production in each cycle. We show that the recovery mechanisms and EOR target volume for HnP and F2F are fundamentally different. We argue that the target volume for HnP is a rubblized ("shattered") rock volume adjacent to the hydraulic fracture. To accurately predict the performance of this rubblized region, we use a compositional reservoir simulator that includes molecular diffusion to model the EOR performance of rubble-rock pieces of varying size. Gridding of numerical models is given considerable attention for both HnP and F2F to show its importance when modeling miscible EOR processes. Coarse gridding may result in significant numerical dispersion, which can falsely yield artificially optimistic recoveries for the HnP process. Results from this paper show that the primary recovery mechanism for HnP stems from a target EOR volume represented by a rubblized rock volume. The size of the rubble, and in particular its minimum dimension, will control the amount of gas that enters, mixes, and recovers oil from the rubble pore space through a process of Darcy flow, molecular diffusion, and phase behavior that involves swelling, vaporization, and first-contact miscibility conditions. The F2F method is not particularly affected by the rubblized region, but instead targets recovery from the entire rock volume between hydraulic fractures; this EOR process is akin to a conventional miscible-displacement mechanism with a much larger EOR target than HnP. The F2F method is presented in this paper as an alternative to the HnP method to show that HnP is not necessarily the best or the only EOR strategy in tight unconventionals. The EOR target volume for F2F is potentially much larger than for HnP, as everything between the fractures may be swept with a piston-like efficiency. However, the response time (i.e. the time before uplift in production is observed) can be much longer for F2F than HnP, depending mainly on the fracture spacing and matrix permeability.
- North America > United States > Texas (1.00)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel > Mediterranean Sea (0.24)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Naturally-fractured reservoirs (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Gas-injection methods (1.00)
- (3 more...)
Performance of Air- Vs. CO2 - Water Injection in a Tight, Light Oil Reservoir: A Laboratory Study
O'Brien, W. J. (Nitec LLC) | Moore, R. G. (Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary) | Mehta, S. A. (Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary) | Ursenbach, M. G. (Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary) | Kuhlman, M. I. (MK Tech Solutions)
Abstract This paper outlines the results of a comparative study of air- and immiscible CO2 - Water injection based Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes for a 30+ °API tight, light oil reservoir. This was accomplished by embedding multiple low- permeability core plugs in crushed reservoir core material to create a composite core that was contained in a 1.84 m long core holder. The objectives of this unscaled experimental work were: 1) to understand the suitability of each EOR process for a low permeability reservoir, 2) to define process parameters prior to a potential field pilot, and 3) to understand the relative merits of each EOR process to mobilize light oil from a tight matrix to a fracture network. A detailed experimental investigation was conducted at realistic reservoir conditions to evaluate the feasibility of an air injection-based EOR process. The air injection results were compared with those from an immiscible CO2-Water injection EOR experiment using the same experimental setup and reservoir conditions. Both the air- and CO2 - Water coreflood tests were performed at 10.3 MPa (1500 psig) and 99 °C in a 100 mm diameter, 1.84 m long composite core-holder using 38 mm diameter reservoir core plugs (that represented the matrix) and mounted within the crushed reservoir core material (that represented the fracture); inert helium gas was used to pressure up the core-holder to reservoir pressure. Permeability of the core plugs was from 0.3 to 3 millidarcies, while the permeability of the crushed core material was 1 to 3 Darcies. Air injection was performed as a standard combustion tube test with injection of 2.3 pore volumes (PV) of air to burn 71% of the packed core length (including helium, a total of 4.3 PV of gas injected). The CO2-Water coreflood was performed with the injection of 2.86 PV of CO2 followed by an extended soak period, then a second injection of an additional 2.86 PV of CO2, followed by the injection of 2.6 PV of water. The pre- and post-test core plug measurements of oil saturation show that the air injection process removed significantly larger quantities of hydrocarbons than the immiscible CO2-Water injection process. Relative to the initial conditions of the core plugs for the Air-Injection experiment, 95+ percent of the hydrocarbons were removed; noting that some fraction of original oil was consumed as fuel. In the post-test CO2-Water injection core plugs, oil recovery was in the range of 30 to 55 percent of OOIP. These findings suggest, under an appropriate field design, that both processes have the potential to recover incremental oil from tight reservoirs. However, the air-injection may be better suited to mobilize oil, due to thermal expansion, rather than the CO2 - Waterflood process.
- North America > United States > Texas (1.00)
- Asia (0.67)
- North America > United States > Alaska > North Slope Borough (0.28)
- Europe > United Kingdom > North Sea > Central North Sea (0.24)
- Geology > Petroleum Play Type > Unconventional Play (0.67)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline > Economic Geology > Petroleum Geology (0.60)
- Water & Waste Management > Water Management > Lifecycle > Disposal/Injection (1.00)
- Energy > Oil & Gas > Upstream (1.00)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yeso Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Yates Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Texas > Permian Basin > Wolfcamp Formation (0.99)
- (29 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Waterflooding (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Gas-injection methods (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Formation Evaluation & Management > Core analysis (1.00)
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study on Oil Mobilization in the Shale Exposed to CO2
Wang, Haitao (State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development) | Lun, Zengmin (Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, SINOPEC) | Lv, Chengyuan (State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development) | Lang, Dongjiang (Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, SINOPEC) | Luo, Ming (State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development) | Zhao, Qingmin (Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute, SINOPEC) | Zhao, Chunpeng (State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development)
Abstract The reservoirs in Qian 3 10 rhythmic layer of Qianjiang Basin were shale oil with intersalt sediments. During natural depletion development process production rapidly decreased. Water injection and CO2 injection were considered as potential technology for shale oil EOR. Due to high salt content of shale rock and dissolution of salt in water, water injection damaged the reservoirs. CO2 injection didn't react with salt to damage the reservoirs. Meanwhile, CO2 could enter micro pores of reservoir rock and mobilize oil by the mechanisms of diffusion, extraction and swelling and so on. In order to verify oil mobilization in shale exposed to CO2 exposure experiments based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were conducted in this study. NMR T2 spectrum can measure the oil signal and determine the oil content of rock with low permeability. In this study 10 fresh shale samples (from 6 depths) were measured and oil contents were determined using NMR T2 spectrum. Two shales with higher oil content were selected and performed exposure experiment. Under the temperature of 40 °C and the pressure of 17.5 MPa fresh shale was exposed to CO2 and NMR T2 spectrum was used to measure the oil content of shale continuously. Oil mobilization in shale exposed to CO2 was determined. The results of NMR T2 spectrum showed that NMR signals of 9 fresh shale samples were good and oil contents of fresh shales were high. Recovery of S5# shale exposed to CO2 was 51.2% after 8 days. Recovery of S9# shale exposed to CO2 was 55.8% after 6.1 days. These results indicated that more than half of shale oil were mobilized with relative long exposed time during CO2 injection. The results of NMR T2 spectrum showed that oil in all pores could be mobilized as exposure time increased. This study showed the quantitative results for CO2 injection and EOR in shale oil of Qianjiang Basin. All conclusions provided confidence to start CO2 EOR pilot project in shale oil with intersalt sediments with ultra-low permeability.
- North America (0.94)
- Asia > China (0.70)
- Asia > Middle East > Turkey > Salt Lake Basin (0.99)
- Asia > China > Shanxi > Ordos Basin (0.99)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi > Ordos Basin (0.99)
- (6 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Shale oil (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Characterization > Exploration, development, structural geology (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Chemical flooding methods (1.00)
- (3 more...)
Abstract The wettability of tight reservoir rock plays a critical role in affecting relative permeability and in turn oil recovery. However, the link between wettability and its effects on oil recovery remains poorly understood, and the potential to boost oil recovery by varying the wettability has not been fully explored. This work was an attempt to conduct a systematic experimental study to improve our understanding of wettability of tight oil reservoirs and the mechanisms of its alteration on oil recovery improvement. Contact angles of individual rock-forming minerals and reservoir rock samples were first measured in brines with different salinities. Then the minerals were aged separately with a medium crude oil with sufficient polar components to investigate their tendency for wettability alteration. As well, oil and water distributions inside tight core samples were scanned by a synchrotron-based computed tomography scanner. Contact angle measurements for all minerals and reservoir rocks showed initial water-wetting behavior. After aging with crude oil for over two months, polar components from the oil adsorbed onto the solid surfaces to alter their wettability to less water wet. Consequently, this wettability alteration contributed to oil and water redistribution and saturation change in reservoir cores. The experimental findings suggested that the wettability in tight reservoirs is a strong function of rock mineralogy, formation fluid properties, and saturation history. Preliminary numerical simulation revealed how rock wettability alteration could contribute to improved oil recovery through waterflooding.
- North America > Canada > Saskatchewan (0.95)
- North America > United States > North Dakota (0.94)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.88)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.54)
- North America > United States > South Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > North Dakota > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Montana > Williston Basin > Bakken Shale Formation (0.99)
- (4 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Characterization > Exploration, development, structural geology (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Improved and Enhanced Recovery > Waterflooding (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Formation Evaluation & Management > Core analysis (1.00)
Boosting Oil Recovery in Unconventional Resources Utilizing Wettability Altering Agents: Successful Translation from Laboratory to Field
Kazempour, Mahdi (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Kiani, Mojtaba (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Nguyen, Duy (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Salehi, Mehdi (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Bidhendi, Mehrnoosh Moradi (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company) | Lantz, Mike (Nalco-Champion, an Ecolab Company)
Abstract In recent years, the United States (US) has experienced a resurrection in hydrocarbon recovery owing to the extraction of oil and gas from unconventional resources. Due to the ultra-low permeability nature of these reservoirs and their oil-wet characteristics, oil production declines are steep and oil recoveries remain very low (< 12% of OOIP). This challenge endures even with the assistance of hydraulic fracturing advancements and well spacing optimizations. The billions of barrels of remaining oil is a good target for chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies. In this study, after comprehensive laboratory testing, a series of customized chemical formulations was developed to improve oil recovery under the challenging conditions of the Middle Bakken and Niobrara formations (temperature >110 °C, salinity>220,000 ppm, and hardness>15,000 ppm). To examine the performance of the selected formulation in the field-scale, a single well enhancement trial was carried out. A detailed review of the lab and field data (pre-and post- treatment) is discussed in this study. Oil rate decline analysis and numerical simulations were used to obtain more insight about the true effectiveness of the chemical treatments. The results of this field trial reveal that injecting a proper wettability altering agent can improve oil recovery from shale oil reservoirs by up to 25% of the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). The results of numerical simulations also show that the additional oil recovered in this field trial cannot be achieved by either well shut-in or straight water injection. The lessons learned from this study provide practical information to optimize similar field trial designs leading to more profitable projects. The concepts and information here can be also translated to other unconventional basins and gas condensate or wet/dry gas reservoirs.
- Geology > Mineral (1.00)
- Geology > Geological Subdiscipline (1.00)
- Geology > Rock Type > Sedimentary Rock > Clastic Rock > Mudrock > Shale (0.36)
- North America > United States > West Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Appalachian Basin > Marcellus Shale Formation (0.99)
- (40 more...)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Shale oil (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs > Naturally-fractured reservoirs (1.00)
- Reservoir Description and Dynamics > Reservoir Fluid Dynamics > Flow in porous media (1.00)
- (5 more...)